RETROACTIVE AMENDMENTS JURISDICTION REPORT: ISRAEL
Michael Factor JMB, Fa©tor & Co
Te Israel Patent Law is anomalous in that pending applications are not published automatically 18 months aſter priority. An abstract is only published aſter the application is allowed, and then the patent and the prosecution file become available for inspection. However, basic details of new patent filings, including the name of the applicant, title, priority and filing dates must be published in the Official Israel Patent Office Gazette (Reshumot in Hebrew) shortly aſter filing.
A proposed amendment to have automatic publication 18 months from priority, as occurs at many other patent offices, had a first reading some years ago, but so far, it has not entered the law.
Back in 2007, due to delays in publishing the printed gazette, the cost and general inconvenience, Dr. Meir Noam, then commissioner of patents, decided to make the information available on the Internet instead of in the printed gazette.
MK David Rotem, chairman of the Knesset Constitution, Law and Justice Committee, criticised Noam for exceeding his authority. Te criticism centred around the Patent Office collecting the first publication fee from all applicants for four years despite not publishing the information on paper. Tis development sparked a class action and resulted in the Ministry of Justice announcing that the three million shekels ($841,000) of fees paid over the period in question would be refunded to the applicants.
On January 12, 2011, the Knesset passed an amendment to the Israel Patent Law 1967 that became effective January 1, 2007. According to the amendment, the first publication is to be on the Internet and not in the official (printed) Patent Office Gazette. Terefore, in retrospect, it appears that Dr. Meir Noam did nothing wrong by publishing these details on the Internet.
In Israel, although retroactive legislation is allowable, such laws are problematic. Generally, retroactive amendments should be applied with care. In this instance, the retroactive nature of the amendment was necessary because otherwise the publication of patent application details on the Israel Patent Office website before their publication in a printed gazette would probably be considered a breach of confidentiality and therefore illegal.
It should be noted that publication in the Official Gazette is itself a legal fiction. As former Supreme Court Judge Chaim Cohen said:
“Publication in the Reshumot has a special value in that what is publicized there—and only there—is considered as published in practice. Even though the man in the street never reads the Reshumot, he cannot claim (in his defense) that he was unaware of what is published there, or what at least
50 World Intellectual Property Review March/April 2011
creates the assumption of knowledge since the mass media will bring to the public that of public interest...
...It creates the legal fiction that despite knowing that the citizen doesn’t read the Reshumot, it is as if he has read, remembers and knows everything publicized there.”
As former Knesset member and expert on constitutional law, Professor Amnon Rubinstein pointed out that, in a parliamentary regime such as Israel’s, in which the government holds power by virtue of the support of the Knesset, no practical importance attaches to rules regarding legislative guidelines.
In other words, the Knesset can do what it likes.
Tere are other pending amendments to the Israel Patent Law that are stuck at various stages of legislation. Tese include:
• An amendment to allow publication of pending applications 18 months from priority, with a possibility of retroactive damages for infringement from that period if the patent issues, together with a clause preventing damages being sought under the Law of Unjust Enrichment
• An amendment to the conditions for patent term extensions negotiated in talks in Washington a year ago that were headed by the Israel Ministry of Industry and Trade Director General Sharon Kedmi—the price for Israel to be relegated from the Special 301 report offender list to the watch list, and
• An amendment concerning government service inventions.
Dr. Michael Factor is a partner at JMB, Fa©tor & Co. He can be contacted at:
mfactor@israel-patents.co.il
www.worldipreview.com
“ AN ABSTRACT IS ONLY PUBLISHED AFTER THE APPLICATION IS ALLOWED AND THEN THE PATENT AND THE PROSECUTION FILE BECOME AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION.”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76