Threats
Habitat loss and fragmentation, small population size and low genetic diversity, harvesting, illegal poaching, and reductions in wolverines’ prey base all contribute to overall global declines in wolverine populations. In Canada, for example, habitat loss to urban/suburban development, agriculture, and non-renewable natural resource developments has the potential to adversely affect wolverine populations in the future4
. In Europe, habitat I
fragmentation is a serious issue, and has led to wolverine populations being confined to discrete areas insufficiently large to support viable populations2
. Habitat fragmentation and
human land use expansion into the wolverines’ range have also increased the frequency of contact and conflict with humans, especially in Fennoscandia. Such conflict lowers tolerance levels and reduces local public support for the conservation of wolverines across their range3
. While in Sweden and Finland
almost no untended sheep grazing occurs in wolverine areas, the Norwegian practice is to leave sheep unattended on mountain pastures during summer2
. Higher stock numbers II
and the loss of herding and livestock guarding traditions have increased the potential for conflict with wolverines2
.
Wolverines preying on semi-domesticated reindeer is well- documented in all Nordic countries2
. Wolverine depredation
on wild ungulates is another source of conflict with humans, as it can result in less game and hunting opportunities as well as reduced income for land-owners3
.
. In North America, the wolverine’s range does not greatly overlap with that of domestic sheep, and so wolverines are not directly targeted for predator control4
.
. In Russia, poaching of wild ungulates combined with a reduction in the domestic reindeer herding industry
Incidents of wolverine poaching occur in Norway, Sweden, and Finland, although the actual extent of poaching is unknown2
48 PROTECTING ARCTIC BIODIVERSITY
In an effort to control livestock losses, the Norwegian government sets annual harvest quotas and practices lethal control by taking young pups out of dens. However, it is questioned whether these measures are sustainable and whether these control measures reduce livestock losses to predators1
Compensation for sheep losses in Norway Thousands
60
40
20 0
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Compensation for sheep suspected of being killed by carnivores
Wolverine
Total number of claims from farmers for sheep losses from protected carnivores Lynx
Bear Wolf
Golden Eagle Not specified
Source: Norwegian Directorate for Nature Management, 2010.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100