Internet of Things
The Hardest Mile
The most difficult part of connecting to the IoT is often the “last mile” from the local Internet connection to the points where equipment or sys- tems reside in a facility. Connecting these “things” means both bringing existing sensors online and pro- curing, configuring, and connecting new sensors.
Surprisingly, the best path may
not be enabling Internet connec- tivity throughout. Less expensive methods can often accomplish the same thing without the complexity of adding hundreds or thousands of new IP addresses.
Radio frequency (RF)-based mesh networks combined with powerful IoT gateways offer an inexpen- sive alternative. For both new and existing operations, wireless mesh sensor networks provide the proper scalability,
redundancy, and ease
of deployment. Without wires to install, these networks can be oper- ational in just hours. Connected to the cloud with an IoT gateway, the network supplies all the technology necessary for data collection and cloud communications.
Figure 1. Temperature Mesh Router Pressure Vibration Humidity Current Level Temperature Flow Power
Contact Closure
Network or Internet
Wireless Sensors Gateway
wireless sensors
Mesh Router
Mesh Router Smart Sensor
The Wireless Sensors solution is a self-configuring and self-healing wireless mesh network employing Intel®
processor-based IoT gateways.
When to Use Mesh To better understand wireless mesh network advantages, consider the alternative. Most wireless IP networks use a star topology in which all nodes communicate directly with the network through devices like IoT gate- ways. If end-to-end transmission times are critical, these direct communication paths provide it. However, star topologies often lack fault tolerance, so this advantage comes at a cost. Network expansion across large build- ings or outdoor areas is also more difficult.
For applications that can tolerate some latency, mesh topologies provide a convenient solution. In this topology, data is forwarded from node to node until the intended final destination is reached. If individual transmis- sion segments are temporarily unavailable, data is automatically re-routed on an alter- nate path. This ability to self-recover from single points of failure considerably increases overall reliability.
56 | 2016 | 13th Edition | Embedded Innovator
SensiNet Architecture Bridge
Mesh Router Smart Sensor
USB
Cellular Cloud
Ethernet Backbone WiFi
Smart Sensor I/O Types Temperature Humidity
Contact Closures 4-20 mA 0-10 Vdc
Differential Pressure RS-485 Serial (Modbus) Control Outputs (contacts)
Figure 2.
Wireless Sensors' implementation of SensiNet* delivers the low latency of the star topology while maintaining the flexibility and resilience of traditional mesh networking.
|
intel.com/embedded-innovator
Primary Path
Secondary Path
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68