This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ADVANCED MANUFACTURING NOW Rod Bricker


Controlling Quality without a Quality Department a M


aintaining consistent quality is a priority for any manufacturer, elevating the perceived importance of the quality control department. Prism Plastics,


however, takes a different approach to quality control. The company operates without a formal quality control depart- ment, a radical departure from convention. Deploying quality control resources before and during the manufacturing pro- cess, Prism achieves the precision, quality and consistency that make post-production quality control redundant. Not having a quality control department seems surprising given Prism’s work: creating precision-molded automotive plastic components used in various mission-critical contexts. But this strategy doesn’t de-emphasize quality. A closer look at the specifi cs shows how proactive quality control can reframe traditional perspectives in manufacturing: Proactivity—Traditional quality control is backwards-fac- ing, with post-production reviews to monitor quality. Prism’s approach turns that inside out, focusing on consistent quality throughout the design and manufacturing process, eliminat- ing mistakes beforehand instead of checking for them after. This requires additional planning and resources, but results in higher quality, enhanced effi ciencies and signifi cant savings. Commitment—Eliminating traditional quality control departments requires hard choices, including being selec- tive about projects. From jobs and processes to technology, feasibility reviews must prioritize quality fi rst. That mindset should be pervasive, extending beyond engineering and manufacturing to other departments, as well. Metrics—One of the important roles of a traditional qual-


ity control department is measuring outcomes and applying standards and metrics to monitor quality and consistency. The need for measurables doesn’t disappear with the depart- ment itself, and manufacturers should diligently collect and analyze KPI and process performance data. Standardization—This is central to the quality-fi rst mod-


el. Variability is the enemy of quality. More variables mean more opportunities for problems. Proactive quality control


14 AdvancedManufacturing.org | March 2016


requires processes, procedures and production equipment to be standardized within facilities across an organization. Automation—Automation boosts consistency by reduc- ing human errors. Prism runs automated manufacturing equipment, using process technicians to monitor production. This hands-off approach reduces the number of employees required to run the facility. Machine burden rates are higher, but it’s offset by dramatically lower labor costs. Accountability—A quality-fi rst approach demands


standards that exceed industry minimums and client expec- tations. Prism establishes variability parameters 30% more precise than client specifi cations. Accountability is a mindset: highlighting real-world outcomes and implications can have a meaningful impact, connecting the abstraction of individual parts to the performance of airbags or seatbelts.


A quality-fi rst approach demands standards that exceed industry minimums and client expectations.


Consistency—Consistent products and performance


require consistent processes. Manufacturers must follow an operational model that consistently delivers quality out- comes. Process-driven consistency requires organization- wide discipline and focus. Manufacturing—Clean manufacturing environments are essential. Prism’s facilities are precisely climate controlled (open doors can trigger environmental alarms) and manufac- turing fl oors are more like operating theaters than industrial facilities. Facility design also matters: standardizing facilities makes infrastructure and processes functionally interchange- able, reducing variability. This approach can yield dramatic results: Prism ships over half a billion parts annually, with a defect rate PPM of less than one. This is practically unheard of in a manufacturing setting.


Co-founder and President Prism Plastics


www.prismplastics.com MODERN MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, SOLUTIONS & STRATEGIES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126