This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
innovations CASTING


Cab Mount Bracket Improved by Converting to Casting


also make it less expensive at the same time. To do that they turned to Dotson Iron Castings (Mankato, Minnesota) to transform the steel fabrication. Casting the cab mount bracket


A


provided several advantages for the applications of the product to meet the tight space requirements and the high load requirements for the multi- function part. T e casting supports and ties the fuel tank strap and the rear sleeper components to the frame for the heavy truck industry. Extensive simulations by Dotson


identifi ed opportunities to reduce casting costs by doubling the core production, automating core placement, and reducing riser waste. T e use of an automated trim press process also cut costs. Dotson utilized software from


MAGMA (Schaumburg, Illinois) in more than 50 mold fi lling and solidifi - cation simulations that were performed during the design stage. T e Dotson engineering team worked closely with the design engineers at one of their cli- ents to gradually modify section thick- nesses in an attempt to allow some of the risers to feed multiple sections. Isolated thick sections on the origi- nal design would have required seven risers per casting to produce a sound part. Numerous gating systems were tested after each casting design change to optimize yield and still produce a sound casting. T e fi nal design required only three risers, and X-ray results showed no sign of porosity. The ductile iron casting was pro- duced via green sand molding and weighs 16.5 lbs. and measures 14 x 4 x 10 in. Along with the challenging perfor-


mance requirements, cost savings was a driving factor for the fi nal product. T rough the combined eff orts of Dotson and its clients, the fi rst prototype cast-


The ductile iron casting was produced via green sand molding and weighs 16.5 lbs. and measures 14 x 4 x 10 in.


pair of companies that collaborate on a cab mount bracket for large trucks wanted to im- prove the product and


ings were developed and launched. T e released product met the performance requirements of the application, however the customer still needed a team eff ort to meet cost saving objectives.


Again, the trio collaborated to de-


velop a cost savings plan to meet the customers’ objectives. With the team eff ort, the overall cost of the system was reduced by at least 10%. ■


The casting supports and ties the fuel tank strap and the rear sleeper components to the frame for the heavy truck industry.


May/Jun 2017 | METAL CASTING DESIGN & PURCHASING | 49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60