search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMENT


IBS Journal October 2016


37


Coming to a screen near you: The changing face of media consumption


Carl Beetham, Business Advisor, Tibit


Look around, right now. You may be sat at your desk, or en-route to somewhere special but you are probably ‘consuming content’ on your smartphone or tablet. On my own daily grind, I very rarely see anyone struggling with a broadsheet or flicking through a ‘red-top’ as the only newspapers commuters appear to read are Metro in the morning and The Standard in the evening. The common denominator is they’re both free.


So, it’ll come as no great surprise that paid-for newspaper circulation is plummeting. We’re all aware of the recent, sad demise of The Independent and this year’s anticipation is Rupert Murdoch will flog only 1.6 million copies of The Sun (from a high of more than double this), the Telegraph a lowly 500k and The Grauniad a mere 166,500. Particularly worrying as I’ve always taken it. And Private Eye. Obviously.


An ol’ print ‘father’ of a Fleet Street ‘Chapel’ once elegantly explained to me that the cover price of the newspaper covered the cost of the PIP (paper, ink and printing press) but that advertising paid for everything else, including everyone’s salaries. But ‘cover price & advertising’ no longer equates to either turning presses or happy newsrooms. With the onset of t’internet, where news is as likely to be published for free, sales have fallen and advertising revenue is on the move. Ask yourself where you’d go to buy a car, your next house, seek out a lonely- heart or a spell in the sun? Once upon a time it would’ve been the classifieds and the displays, now it’s online. Today, online advertising contributes in the region of as little as 10% of overall revenue to the newspaper publisher. Factor in the phenomena of adblocking, which is decimating eye- ball, impression and click-through revenues, and it ain’t rosy in the garden.


The press has always faced challenges from innovation and


changing social trends – and they’ve been particularly adept at proving to be rivers of gold in brave new worlds. Several titles have successfully placed their premium content out of reach of the great-unwashed behind non-negotiable paywalls and tightly controlled subscriptions. However, for the majority of news providers, it simply doesn’t work.


The manner in which we read the news has changed forever: online readership is sporadic, irregular, often spontaneous and impulsive, and the way we wish to pay for it needs to replicate this. Micropayments have never (yet) worked and $1 billion has been wasted establishing precious little, but are events now conspiring to change this?


Analysing the expansive 20 years’ research of Shirky, Szabo & Isaacson, and appreciating why the overwhelming majority of micropayment companies have gone to the wall, we now realise the decision to purchase news needs to be binary: yea/nay, and the consumer should be trusted to set the payment amount at a level both sides are happy with. Three seconds, one-click and people will do the decent thing. Ask Radiohead. Go check out Tibit and you’ll see what I mean. A very novel take on all that has gone before.


Think we don’t need high quality, investigative journalism? Cast your mind back to All The President’s Men, Spotlight and The Guardian’s unearthed phone- hacking and WikiLeaks scandals. Journalism’s not broken, but the model that pays for it, is. If this isn’t changed, all future generations will have on their small screens will be ad-swamp, click-bait, paid-for-content and churnalism, and our ‘daily rag’ will be no more than a quaint, poignant anomaly of the 20th century.


www.ibsintelligence.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52