consultation, feedback from stakeholders and the formal submission as part of the Planning Inspectorate examination process (e.g. Relevant Representations, Written Representations and the Planning Inspectorate issued Report on the Implications for European Sites with its accompanying RIES matrices).
35.
This HRA process and its outputs have also been informed by the on-going discussions taking place as part of the Evidence Plan process for the proposed project.
3.4.2 Consideration of Plans and Projects for Assessment of In-combination Effects 36.
This assessment will present relevant in-combination impacts (e.g. collision risk to migratory birds from offshore windfarms) of projects in a tiered form as advised by Natural England (JNCC and Natural England 2013a) through the Evidence Plan process.
37.
EATL have interpreted the JNCC and Natural England advice and, for the proposed East Anglia THREE project, follow the approach outlined for East Anglia ONE during its examination. Projects are included in the quantitative assessment where there is sufficient certainty and data confidence that they make a meaningful contribution to the assessment process.
HRA High Level Screening May 2014
East Anglia THREE Offshore Windfarm Page 11
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67