ENERGY MANAGEMENT
THE FIVE-STEP- PLUS APPROACH
To successfully carry out energy management within an organisation, a system needs to be introduced that is simple to understand. This should address management issues, both within the organisation and for the building(s), with the resulting energy savings providing a competitive business advantage. The system must provide a structured approach and a framework in which to work. It is essential that the outputs provide a clear sense of direction for the organisation and communicate the objectives to all of the stakeholders. Alongside this, the system should measure and monitor and, to keep its objectivity and reputation, be easy to audit. Last but not least, the modern management philosophy is one of continuous improvement, where any system must review and capture the lessons learned and then act on them.
Such a system, which has been tried and tested over many years, is a five-step approach (see figure 1) introduced by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) through the energy-efficiency best-practice programme in the 1990s. This is now part of the Carbon Trust’s portfolio of publications at both a strategic and implementation1 level. The strategic energy management guide also contains sample energy policies that can be downloaded and used as exemplars.
In developing an energy policy, these key points should be addressed:
• state the way energy is used • state global targets • state managerial responsibilities • state staff responsibilities
34 | TOMORROW’S FM
The latest schemes for managing energy in the built environment stress the importance of continually improving performance, explains Andy Lewry a principal consultant at BRE. • lay out future plans
The energy policy is typically in two parts, where the first part is a high- level statement. The second part should have specific objectives and targets and be used to:
• communicate board commitment • raise staff awareness
• demonstrate commitment to key stakeholders
• underpin the energy strategy
• provide a structure for implementation
Although this approach is a great step forward to integrating energy management within an organisation’s managerial processes, it has a fundamental flaw: it does not close the loop and produce an iterative process where the lessons learned feed back into the process, which is then improved.
Once the simple system is in place it should be refined in a manner that it learns from both its successes and mistakes.
For the past few years BRE has been advocating an approach where the loop is closed by a review and audit step whose analysis produces the lessons learned. These are then fed into a plan for improvement, which embraces all aspects of the process and includes an action plan for change. This approach should be adopted once the energy management programme has gained momentum.
This approach is in line with the approach of a new international energy management standard (EnMS), which was published in
The key to this standard is the approach it has adopted – the plan, do, check, act approach:
Plan: Conduct the energy review and establish the baseline, energy
performance indicators, objectives, targets and action plans necessary to deliver results that will improve energy performance in accordance with the organisation’s energy policy.
Do: Implement the energy management action plans.
Check: Monitor and measure processes and the key
characteristics of operations that determine energy performance against the energy policy and
objectives, and report the results. Act: Take actions to continually
improve energy performance and the international EnMS.
June 2011. ISO 50001:2011. ISO 50001 specifies requirements for an organisation to establish, implement, maintain and improve an energy management system. This allows organisations to take a systematic approach to the continuous improvement of energy performance, including efficiency, end use and consumption. Even for organisations that have been committed to energy management for a long time, or that may already be certified to ISO 14001, case studies indicate that the more formalised processes required by the new standard can lead to new opportunities and procedures being identified and implemented.
www.bre.co.uk twitter.com/TomorrowsFM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70