ASIPI: PLANT VARIETY PROTECTION
T
he Brazilian legal system is facing an unprecedented intellectual property dispute between two of
In order to legally obtain substantive proof the largest
cellulose companies in Brazil. For the first time since Brazil became a member of
the
International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV), and then adopted the Plant Variety Protection (PVP) Act, we are seeing a lawsuit covering the enforcement and potential infringement of rights related to a protected variety of eucalyptus. Fibria Celulose is a Brazilian company,
and owner of plant variety protection rights covering more than 26 protected eucalyptus varieties in Brazil. Te rights have been granted by (and/or applied for at) the National Plant Varieties Protection Service, in accordance with Law No. 9.456/97, part of the PVP Act. A possible violation of rights of Fibria’s
eucalyptus variety VT02, for which a PVP certificate was issued on July 25, 2007, motivated the company to file a precautionary measure (judicial seizure of
to file the main lawsuit against Eldorado, Fibria Celulose filed a precautionary measure and requested that the judge issue a preliminary injunction to collect samples from Eldorado’s trees. Te samples would be used for a legal analysis conducted by an expert to be indicated by the judge.
Important features Many appeals have been filed in order to discuss important features of
whose technical report pointed out that samples collected from Eldoraldo’s eucalyptus fields do not differ from VT02. Based on DNA analysis using microsatellite molecular markers, the report concluded that five out of six of Eldorado’s samples shared 99.99999981% of the same features as Fibria’s VT02. Although the Brazilian PVP law establishes
this case. Te appeals
asked for clarification on matters including: • Which laboratory will be responsible for the DNA test, since the only one capable to do it was responsible for a private test and a report requested by Fibria. Te report was shown as evidence to obtain the injunction when the court action was filed;
• Te content of such report, since the plaintiff asked for a DNA report and the counterpart also asked for a morphologic report; and
samples for
laboratory testing), before the Court of Três Lagoas, against Eldorado Brasil Celulose, a direct competitor in the cellulose market. According to
Fibria, Eldorado was
using clones of its VT02 plant variety in its eucalyptus plantation fields. Brazilian PVP law grants a term of
protection of 15 years (or 18 years for trees such as eucalypts) from the issuance of the Provisional Certificate of Protection within Brazilian territory. Te protection covers the vegetative propagating material of the whole plant and prevents third parties from producing it
for commercial purposes or
offering it for sale or marketing, without the owner’s authorisation. Also, those who sell, offer for sale, reproduce,
import, export, pack or store the plants for commercial gain, or provide promotional material, without authorisation, are obliged to compensate the owner. According to Law No. 9.456/97, the infringer
will have to pay a fine equivalent to 20% of the commercial value of the seized material and the infringement will be considered a criminal violation of the plant breeder’s rights, without prejudice to other criminal penalties.
Alberto Guerra Neto is a senior partner at Guerra IP and a delegate at ASIPI. He can be contacted at:
alberto@guerraip.com
Rodrigo Ferreira is a partner at Guerra IP. He
can be
rodrigo@guerraip.com contacted at:
• Te content of the DNA and morphological tests in the same report/conclusion. Aſter favourable decisions
for both sides in all
those appeals, the High Court has decided to execute only the DNA test by the previous designated lab (a respected and capable one, although it had been hired before by Fibria). In this regard, the judge designated an expert,
that plant varieties should be identified based on morphological aspects of the plant (leaves, fruits, flowers, etc), to comply with minimal requirements of distinctiveness, homogeneity and stability,
the current practice and
guidelines of UPOV accept and even promote the use of modern molecular technologies that may provide high quality results within a less laborious short term, in comparison to traditional methods that may depend on the plant’s stage of growth and other conditions. Having the technical report available, the
judge shall issue a decision on this request for a precautionary measure. Tis is just the starting point of what it is considered a leading case on IP matters related to plant breeders’ rights in Brazil. Not only the parties directly involved in
this action are interested—the whole Brazilian IP community is engrossed in this case and is looking forward to following future developments.
www.worldipreview.com
World Intellectual Property Review Annual 2015
39
CHAIKOVSKIY IGOR (TOP), WILL RODRIGUES (BELOW) /
SHUTTERSTOCK.COM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140