This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
BUSINESS BRIEF: MALAYSIA


“THE BORDER MEASURE PROVISIONS ARE STILL UNDER-UTILISED, ALTHOUGH THESE ARE POWERFUL TOOLS TO RESTRICT AND PROHIBIT THE IMPORTATION OF COUNTERFEIT GOODS INTO THE COUNTRY.”


tool for enforcing trademark rights. A Trade Description Order (TDO) is a declaratory order granted by the High Courts that says whether an offending mark is a false trade description. Where a TDO has been issued, the enforcement division will act on the complaint and carry out the relevant seizures. Where the identity of the main infringer is


known and there is knowledge that the party has sufficient assets to pay damages and costs, a civil suit may also be contemplated.


How can public-private partnerships to tackle counterfeiting be improved? Closer interaction


Parties should document all works in a tangible form and affirm a statutory declaration of copyright ownership.


between public and


private groups can significantly help to curtail counterfeiting activities. Te Basket of Brands programme is one example of a joint effort between brand owners and the public enforcement unit, where the enforcement division conducts raids for the brands registered under this programme without the need for investigations and the lodging of formal complaints. Joint training sessions


with the Royal


Malaysian Customs (RMC) have also seen encouraging results, where the emphasis is to create a training platform for RMC officials to enhance brand knowledge and recognition.


Copyright What are the key challenges to copyright owners in your jurisdiction? Copyright is fraught with challenges, mainly associated with the advancement of technology and the lack of


regulations to curb online


copyright infringement. Te sophisticated circumvention measures by copyright infringers has also posed difficulties.


How should people ensure they are protected against copyright infringement? Tere is no registration system for copyright.


www.worldipreview.com


What is the best way to deal with infringement? It is customary to send a letter of demand or a cease-and-desist letter before initiating a civil action. Acts of copyright infringement are actionable under both a criminal and civil action. Under the Copyright Act 1987, police and enforcement officials at the MDTCC can exercise their powers to enter any premises if they reasonably believe or suspect that such premises have any infringing materials, and seize these infringing materials with a warrant. An injunction to halt the production of copyright-infringing works could also effective.


be


General Are there any other IP developments we should know about? Te Industrial Designs (Amendment) Act 2013 (IDAA 2013), which came into force on July 1, 2013, introduced several amendments. First, the standard of novelty changed to worldwide from local. Another significant change brought by the IDAA 2013 is the extension of the registration period from 15 to 25 years. Additionally, the government is spearheading


efforts to enable businesses to expand using IP rights as collateral means to obtain financing. A valuation model will be created to enable IP rights to be valued and commercialised in the market. Te trademark, copyright and patent acts are


also in the midst of being amended in order to include provisions for the securitisation and monetisation of IP.


Jyeshta Mahendran is a trademark and patent attorney at Shearn Delamore. She focuses on trademarks and industrial designs, including prosecution, copyright, licensing, and anti-competition law. She is a committee member of the East Asia and Pacific anti-counterfeiting committee at


INTA. She can be contacted at: jyeshta@shearndelamore.com


Karen Abraham jointly heads the intellectual property and information technology department of Shearn Delamore. She has experience in IP litigation, mediation, enforcement, and brand consultation and management. Abraham is on INTA’s panel of neutrals, and is an accredited mediator of


the


Malaysian Mediation Centre. She can be contacted at: karen@shearndelamore.com


World Intellectual Property Review Annual 2015 103


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com