ANTI-COUNTERFEITING
Online counterfeiting in China is a constant worry for many brand owners, but the government there seems to be stepping up its attempts to combat the problem. Zhang Xu of HFG Law & Intellectual Property explains more.
T
he rise of the internet has created an immensely prosperous cyber world, but online sales of counterfeits are
troubling companies all over the globe. A survey by the China-based Quality Brands Protection Committee (QBPC) of all its member companies showed that international right owners are confronted with the following problems related to online infringement: • Counterfeit and infringing sales on e-commerce platforms, apparently concentrated on business- to-business and business-to-consumer portals in China;
• Prioritising listings of websites selling fake and infringing products via search engine optimisation strategy;
• Sales of counterfeit and infringing goods on social media; and
• Independent shopping sites, especially those aimed at overseas markets. T e sale of counterfeits remains almost every
QBPC member company’s concern. Given that e-commerce has become synonymous with China’s economy,
e-commerce giants enjoy
preferential treatment from the government. Together with prevailing industry rules such as ‘technology-neutral’ and ‘safe harbour’ this means that e-commerce marketplaces shoulder less liability for combating counterfeits and infringing products available on their platforms. According to an academic study by Peking
University, in proceedings arising from infringing and counterfeit goods being sold on third party platforms, a mere 7% of them were sentenced to bear joint liability, whereas the remaining 93% were acquitted by courts. Laws and regulations relating to counterfeit
sales on internet platforms are presently the Tort Law, Regulations on Protection for the Right of Network Dissemination of Information, and Interim Administrative Measures on Online Commodity Trading and Services. Although these have provided a framework for
resolving infringement disputes, in the opinion of brand owners the determination of e-commerce providers’ liability is comparatively poor in the face of suspect products on sale in China.
Welcome change T e release of interim provisions by China’s Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM) seemingly
www.worldipreview.com
provides for a positive change for proprietors. In December 2014, the MOFCOM promulgated a draſt of the Administrative Protocol Rules on Online Retailing Conducted via T ird-Party Platform Transaction (����� �����), known as the draſt transaction protocol rules. T e regulation specifi es that
With a view to strengthening government third party
platforms have an obligation to fi le necessary information in the course of a transaction. T e protocols related to intellectual property rights are the following: • Protocol (III) on IP protection, which refers to the protocol for protection of IP and prevention of counterfeit and sub-standard goods;
• Protocol (VI) on information disclosure, which details that third party platforms shall require that cyber retailers operate using their real name, and shall examine and verify their business qualifi cation by law; and
• Protocol (VII) on control and prevention of illegal information, which means third party retail platforms shall control and prevent platform-posted web advertisements or information about goods and services in violation of national laws and regulations. Moreover, it provides that the platform has obligations to publicise and fi le reports with the MOFCOM. In cases of non-compliance, commerce authorities shall ask the off ender to rectify its fault in due course. T is provision contains no punitive measures such as monetary penalties. In addition, the Commerce Law is now under legislative process. An initial draſt will be submitted to state legislature for comments and consideration by late March 2015. It is only natural that legislation concerned
with the World Wide Web tends inevitably to lag behind the rapid development of internet technology. In such a context, practices of each stakeholder are of real importance. Following intensive research, which targeted right owners and e-commerce platform operators, into counterfeiting and infringement on online marketplaces throughout 2014, the MOFCOM, the State Administration
of Industry and
Commerce and the General Administration of Quality Supervision, Inspection and Quarantine have largely confi rmed that e-commerce will be a focus of future IP protection.
regulation, competent authorities may dispatch personnel to, or establish liaison offi ces at, major e-commerce players. IP proprietors can begin to consider fi ghting the sale of counterfeits and infringing activities in coordinated eff orts in the offl ine and online spheres. Likewise, e-commerce giants seem to be
releasing themselves from armed defence against infringement, while trying a more insightful interpretation of their roles in anti-counterfeiting and anti-infringement
from the perspective of
social responsibility. Alibaba Group chairman Jack Ma commented in a public forum that the greatest contribution e-commerce has made to society is possibly that it will help to solve counterfeiting and infringement in the next two decades. According to Ma, it may take 20 years to fi nd a
solution to the problem of counterfeit sales. T is may be too long, however. We must become aware that it will be a painstaking course, particularly in the context of China. However,
people need not take pessimistic view. T e growth of
a the internet
provides us with technological approaches to the problem and we can formulate more eff ective solutions.
Zhang Xu is a partner at HFG Law & Intellectual Property. He specialises in IP strategy, trademark infringement, anti- counterfeiting, anti-unfair competition, and administrative enforcement, civil litigation, and criminal prosecution. Xu provides legal services to many Fortune 500 clients. He can be contacted at:
xzhang@hfgip.com
World Intellectual Property Review Annual 2015
29
SIARHEI TOLAK /
SHUTTERSTOCK.COM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140