This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
1184 infection control & hospital epidemiology october 2015, vol. 36, no. 10


freestanding children’s hospitals across the United States. The PHIS hospitals are 43 of the largest children’s hospitals in America. These hospitals represent 17 of 20majormetropolitan areas in the United States. Data elements present in the PHIS database include demographics, insurance information, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) procedure and diagnosis codes, and resource utilization data including billing data for pharmacy, imaging, and clinical services. Our analysis was limited to the 41 hospitals that provided all data elements during the study period.


Study Population


Children aged 1–18 years discharged from PHIS hospitals between January 1, 2006 and August 31, 2011 were eligible for inclusion in the study. Patients hospitalized for <3 days were excluded from the analysis. Children with CDI were identified using a previously validated case-finding tool10 that included the presence of an ICD-9-CM code due to Clostridium difficile (008.45) plus a billing charge for a C. difficile test. Hospital onset (HO) CDI was defined as a C. difficile test ≥3 days after hospital admission. Community onset (CO) CDI was defined as a C. difficile test prior to hospital day 3. The day of admission was defined as day 0. Only the first CDI-related hospitalization for each patient was used in the analysis.


Outcomes


The primary outcome for the study was all-cause in-hospital mortality occurring during an index admission within 30 days of a C. difficile test. CDI-related readmission within 8 weeks, the secondary outcome, was defined as a subsequent admis- sion within 8 weeks of the initial C. difficile test date that included both a C. difficile test charge within 48 hours of admission and receipt of CDI-directed therapy (ie, metroni- dazole or oral vancomycin).


Data Collection


All data utilized for this study were obtained from the PHIS database. Demographic and clinical information collected for each patient included age, sex, race, presence and type of comorbid condition, and in-hospital medication exposures including antimicrobial agents, proton pump inhibitors, H2 blockers, and total parenteral nutrition. Receipt of antibiotics 90 days prior to CDI was classified in 2 ways: (1) the presence of any antibiotics represented as yes/no and (2) the total number of antibiotic classes. Treatment for CDI was defined as the receipt of metronidazole or oral vancomycin. The presence and type of comorbid condition was classified using a pre- viously validated classification system that groups ICD-9-CM diagnostic codes into pediatric chronic conditions.11 Data collected on underlying severity of illness included admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and receipt of respiratory


support (supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation) or pressor support (dopamine, epinephrine, dobutamine, or norepinephrine).


Statistical Analysis


Summary statistics were constructed using frequencies for categorical variables and medians for continuous variables. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test when appropriate, and continuous variables were compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. Univariate analyses, using simple logistic regression, were conducted to identify potential risk factors for in-hospital death or CDI- related readmissionamong children withCDI. All variables with P<.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the final multivariable logistic regression model. The number of inpa- tient deaths among the cohort limited the number of potential risk factors included in the finalmultivariablemodel. Therefore, to characterize the underlying severity of illness, a composite severity of illness variable was created from the following data elements: admission to the ICU, receipt of pressor support, or receipt of respiratory support in the 48 hours prior to the C. difficile test. The severity of illness variable ranged from a score of 0 to 3, 0 representing a patient with an absence of all severity of illness markers and 3 representing a patient with all 3 markers. Using the final multivariable model, we derived predictions of the probability of death for each factor and combinations of factors that were independently associated with in-hospitalmortality. All analyses were performed using SAS 9.3 (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC) or Stata 12.1 (Stata Corp., College Station, TX).


results Patient Characteristics


We identified 7,318 children with CDI that met our inclusion criteria during the study period. Table 1 displays the characteristics of these children. Median age of patients with CDI was 6 years [interquartile range (IQR), 2–13]. The majority of children (51.8%) were male, had at least 1 comorbid condition (74.9%), were classified as CO-CDI (52.9%), had gastric acid suppression (GAS) within 30 days prior to C. difficile test (58.6%), and received an antibiotic within 90 days prior to their C. difficile test (74.9%).


Primary Outcome: Risk Factors for In-Hospital Mortality


Among the study cohort, 109 (1.5%) children with CDI died in the hospital within 30 days of their C. difficile test. Univariate analysis identified several potential risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality (Table 2). These potential factors include age, severity of illness markers, number of classes of antibiotics received within 30 days prior to C. difficile test, GAS (receipt of proton pump inhibitors or H2 blockers) within 30 days,


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140