This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ebd environmental dna and infections 1137


figure 3. Environmental pathogen presence and inpatient infections. For each of N=16 months of surveillance conducted, the number of nosocomial infections per 1,000 inpatients was plotted relative to the number of target organism (TO)–positive assays per 20 rooms. (A) A regression plot utilizing all 16 PCR-based E. coli measurements is shown with a dashed line (Y-intercept: 3.21, slope: 0.61). A Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient of r=0.48 was computed for these data, which corresponds to P=.0289. (A 1-tailed test was used because it is reasonable to assume that increased environmental presence of a pathogen leads to increased incidence of disease). Because only 2 rooms were surveyed in December 2011, this data point—(10.00, 3.16), plotted with an empty circle—may not be appropriate for analysis. When ignored, the regression plot shown using a solid line (Y-intercept: 2.00, slope: 1.06) is obtained. For this subset of N=15 measurements, Pearson’s r corresponds to 0.71, with P=.00147. (B) A regression plot utilizing all 16 culture-based Enterococcus spp. measurements is shown with a dashed line (Y-intercept: 1.70, slope: 0.30). A Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficient of r=0.44 was computed for these data, which corresponds to P=.0436 (1-tailed test). The data point for the December 2011 survey, (10.00, 3.16), is represented by an empty circle. When ignored, the regression plot shown using a solid line (Y-intercept: 1.53, slope: 0.58) obtains. For this subset of N=15 measurements, Pearson’s r corresponds to 0.54, P=.0187.


logistical constraints prevented us from using Petri films, dipped slides, or disinfectant neutralizers. Therefore, the environmental burden of TOs may have been underestimated. However, the PCR assays we used are highly sensitive. Additionally, our findings might not be generalizable to civi- lian hospitals, but patients of all ages and races are treated at FBCH. In conclusion, sinks were frequently contaminated at this


Limitations of this study include the fact that financial and


facility despite EBD; clearly they remain an important potential reservoir for HAI transmission.27–29 We hope that this study spurs similar investigations at other EBD facilities, which are needed to determine how EBD impacts surface contamination, cleaning, and HAI-related outcomes.


acknowledgments


We would like to thank Lee Hudson and the late George Nussbaum for their insights into hospital design and construction, and David B. Goldman for critical review of the manuscript. Financial support: This work was supported by the Military Infectious Dis-


ease Research Program; the Congressional War Supplement Fund; the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance System; and the US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command. Potential conflicts of interest: There are no conflicts of interest and nothing to


disclose.


Address all correspondence to Emil Lesho, 503 Robert Grant Avenue, Silver Spring, MD 20910 (carolinelesho@yahoo.com).


supplementary material


To view supplementary material for this article, please visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ice.2015.151 references


1. Department of Health and Human Services. National action plan to prevent healthcare-associated infections: roadmap to elimination. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services; 2013.


2. Bogusz A, Stewart M, Hunter J, et al. How quickly do hospital surfaces become contaminated after detergent cleaning? Health- care Infect 2013;18:3–9.


3. Sattar SA. Promises and pitfalls of recent advances in chemical means of preventing the spread of nosocomial infections by environmental surfaces. Am J Infect Control 2010;38:S34–S40.


4. WeberDJ, Rutala WA. Understanding and preventing transmission of healthcare-associated pathogens due to the contaminated hos- pital environment. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34:449–452.


5. Huslage K, Rutala WA, Gergen MF, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Weber DJ. Microbial assessment of high-, medium-, and low-touch hospital room surfaces. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013;34: 211–212.


6. Septimus E, Weinstein RA, Perl TM, Goldmann DA, Yokoe DS. Approaches for preventing healthcare-associated infections: go long or go wide? Infect Control Hosp Epidemio 2014;35: 797–801.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140