This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
hospital-wide surveillance of overall hai 1141


− −


figure 1. Relative proportion (A) and incidences (B) of all healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) in intensive care units (ICUs) and outside of ICUs at University of North Carolina (UNC) Hospitals, 2001–2012. In ICU settings, HAI incidence fell from 16.84 to 8.37 infections per 1,000 patient days (50% reduction, incidence rate difference=


− from 5.58 to 3.75 infections per 1,000 patient days (33% reduction, incidence rate difference= 1.92, P<.001).


statistically significant. This study was approved by the Institu- tional Review Board of UNC Chapel Hill (IRB No. 06-0437).


results


Of a total of 16,579 HAIs that occurred during the 12-year study period, 6,397 HAIs occurred in ICUs (33%–44% of all HAIs each year) and 10,182 HAIs occurred in non-ICU settings (56%–67% of all HAIs each year) (Figure 1). The incidence of overall HAIs throughout UNC Hospitals decreased significantly from 7.90 in 2003 to 4.60 in 2012 infections per 1,000 patient days (ie, 42% reduction, incidence rate difference=


− 3.39, P<.001).


incidences of HAIs by specific infection site in overall UNC Hospitals are provided in Figure 2 and Table 2. Overall at UNC Hospitals, the relative proportions of BSI and UTI decreased by 13% and 5%, and the incidence of RTI remained unchanged, but the incidences of SSI and C. difficile infection (CDI) increased by 9% and 16%, respectively. The relative proportion of other types of HAI approximately doubled throughout UNC Hospitals from 2001 to 2012. Overall at UNC Hospitals, the


Relative proportion of HAIs by major infection site and


8.39, P<.001). In non-ICU settings, the HAI incidence fell −


− incidence rate difference for BSI was 1.53 infections per 1,000


patient days (P<.001); for pneumonia the incidence rate dif- ference was


per 1,000 patient days (P<.001). However, the incidence rates of LRTI, SSI, and other types of HAI remained unchanged. In other types of HAI, the incidence rate differences for cardio- vascular system infections, gastrointestinal infections, and skin and soft-tissue infections were (P=.003), and


and for UTI the incidence rate difference was −


0.19 (P<.001), +0.53 0.20 (P<.001) per 1,000 patient days,


respectively. The incidences of bone and joint infection, eye, ear, nose, throat, or mouth infections, central nervous system infection, reproductive tract infection, and systemic infection in overall UNC Hospitals were <0.1 infections per 1,000 patient days. The incidence rate differences for CLABSI, VAP, and CAUTI were days,


− − −


1.39 (P=.001) infections per 1,000 central-line 4.52 (P<.001) infections per 1,000 ventilator days, and 3.20 (P=.005) infections per 1,000 catheter days, respectively.


Thus, there was a striking reduction in such device-associated infections. Importantly, the incidence of CDI increased sig- nificantly from 0.11 in 2003 to 0.81 in 2012 per 1,000 patient days throughoutUNC Hospitals (ie, a 636%increase, incidence


0.50 infections per 1,000 patient days (P<.001); −


1.55 infections


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140