This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
infection control & hospital epidemiology october 2015, vol. 36, no. 10 original article


Reuse of Insulin Pens Among Multiple Patients at 2 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers


Patricia Schirmer, MD;1 Carla A. Winston, PhD, MA;1 Cynthia Lucero-Obusan, MD;1 Mark Winters, MS;2 Alan Lesse, MD;3,4 Charles de Comarmond, MD;5 Gina Oda, MS;1 Richard A. Martinello, MD;1,6 Mark Holodniy, MD1,2,*


objective. To determine whether reuse of insulin pens among multiple patients resulted in transmission of bloodborne pathogens (BBP). design. Retrospective cohort study. setting. Two Veterans Affairs medical centers. patients. Veterans who received insulin via insulin pens from 2010 to 2013.


methods. Patients were identified through electronic health records, notified of possible exposure, and serotested for human immunode- ficiency virus, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus. Newly discovered case patients were assessed in relation to potential proximate patients to determine viral strain relatedness by HCV envelope (env) gene sequencing.


results. Of 1,791 hospitalized veterans who received insulin via insulin pen, 1,155 were tested for at least 1 viral infection after exposure. Of these, 67 patients were newly diagnosed with 1 or more viral BBPs. For human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis B virus no additional strain testing of case or proximate patients was possible; 8 HCV cases and 45 proximates (40 unique patients; 5 patients were positive for 2 genotypes) were identified as needing strain testing. Only 3 cases and their 19 proximates had samples available for further testing. None of the 26 remaining proximate patients had blood available for further testing. Median genetic distance between the HCV env sequences of those available for additional testing ranged from 14% to 24%, indicating nonrelatedness.


conclusions. Our investigation revealed that exposure to insulin pen reuse did not result inHCV transmission among patients who had viral genetic analysis performed. Analysis for any additional potential transmission of blood-borne pathogens was limited by the available samples.


Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 2015;36(10):1121–1129


Insulin pens are a combined syringe and insulin system originally developed for outpatient use owing to portability and ease of use. Reusable and disposable pens are currently available and can be used multiple times, for a single person only, using a new needle with each injection.1,2 Given potential backflow of blood into pen cartridges


during injection, insulin pens should not be shared among patients. If pens are reused among multiple patients, there is risk for bloodborne pathogen (BBP) transmission, despite changing needles between uses. Biological material, including macrophages, epithelial cells, and red blood cells, has been found in needles and cartridges from diabetic patients.3–5 However, no BBP transmission associated with insulin pen reuse on multiple patients has been documented.1


Recently, advisories were issued by the Institute of Safe Medication Practices, US Food and Drug Administration, and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention against insulin pen reuse on multiple patients owing to the risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) transmission.6–10 Similarly, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) notified providers about inappropriate use of multidose pen injectors (including insulin pens) and on February 4, 2013, use was prohibited on all VA inpatient care units except in rare circumstances.1,11 Herein, we describe insulin pen reuse exposures at 2 VA


medical centers prior to prohibition of insulin pen use in VA inpatient units. Our objective was to determine whether reuse of insulin pens among multiple patients resulted in transmis- sion of bloodborne pathogens.


Affiliations: 1. Office of Public Health, Department of Veterans Affairs, Washington, DC; 2. Stanford University, Stanford, California; 3. Veterans Affairs


Western New York Healthcare System, Buffalo Medical Center, Buffalo, New York; 4. University at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York; 5. W. G. “Bill” Hefner Veterans AffairsMedical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina; 6. Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.


*Presented in part: IDWeek 2014; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; October 11, 2014 (abstract 1730). The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States government.


© 2015 by The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America. All rights reserved. 0899-823X/2015/3610-0001. DOI: 10.1017/ice.2015.165 Received March 26, 2015; accepted June 17, 2015; electronically published July 22, 2015

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140