search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
WIND MONITORING


FEATURE SPONSOR


A DAY TO REMEMBER IN THE WORLD OF WIND MONITORING?


On the 3rd of March 2017 the international standards and conformity assessment body for all fields of electrotechnology, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), published a new standard to deliver the technical basis for the acceptance of lidar measurements for wind turbine power performance testing and wind resource assessments


CONTINUOUS WAVE LIDARS


Continuous Wave Lidars, such as ZephIR 300, deliver remote wind measurements from just 10 metres above the ground, up to 200 metres and above without the need of a conventional tall met mast. Planning permits required for tall structures are reduced and working at height Health & Safety considerations are removed. Lidars are also extremely mobile expanding the number of measurements that can be taken across a site.


MAJOR MILESTONE


The release of the new standard, IEC 61400-12-1:2017, is considered a major milestone in lidar’s growing maturity,


formally allowing lidar as a supplementary or alternative measurement technique to mast-mounted cup anemometers. That in itself is significant, but there are further implications: this is the culmination of effort within the wind industry as it strives to evolve into a mature business. This IEC guidance recognises the decoupling of the relationship between a cup anemometer at hub height and the full swept area of the electricity- generating turbine.


ROTOR EQUIVALENT WIND SPEED (REWS)


The guidance introduces the ‘REWS’ concept that looks at the turbine performance relative to the wind shear and veer profile across the swept area.


It makes sense, especially when looking at ever-larger blade lengths and hub heights. It was not always popular for us, a lidar manufacturer, to say so but it really is beginning to look like the wind energy industry is outgrowing cup and mast anemometry.


WIDER IMPLICATIONS


The guidance itself has wider implications – for all who use it in anger know very well it isn’t just about power performance measurements, it underpins all wind resource assessment measurements involved in the estimation of annual energy production.


It is a guidance for ‘good’ wind measurement principles and in the build up to its release have seen the


40


www.windenergynetwork.co.uk


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76