This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
LIVE24SEVEN // Business


Social Media in the workplace


I have yet to come across an employer that hasn’t had some element of difficulty in the workplace following the rise of social media over the last decade.


From Facebook to Snapchat and all the blogs and vlogs in- between, we now live in an age where the younger generation have grown up using these social media tools and therefore, is it fair to punish them for their continued use if this is all they know…not always!


One prime example of this was an enquiry I received recently: “My employee sent his Line Manager a snapchat message confirming he was ill and would not be in work, can I discipline him?” To discipline fairly for this reporting style the employee would have to be in breach of the Company Sickness Absence Procedure. If there is not one in place or it doesn’t specifically state that an employee has to telephone their Line Manager or use specified means of communication, then a snapchat message would constitute notification. In this situation the Policy only stated the employee’s Line Manager must be notified before 08.30am and therefore clear reporting guidelines were not in place for employees to follow.


What to watch out for... ¥ Breach of Company Policy ¥ Confidentiality ¥ Vicarious Liability ¥ Bully & Harassment ¥ Reputational Damage ¥ LinkedIn Ownership ¥ Training ¥ ET Views


Social Media Policy ¥ Who is covered by Policy ¥ Scope and Purpose of Policy ¥ Do's & Dont's ¥ Compliance with related Policies ¥ Personal use of Social Media ¥ Prohibited use ¥ Monitoring ¥ Business Use ¥ Recruitment ¥ Contractual Preventions


Rebecca Hardy Practice Director and Director of Client HR


The problems with personal usage doesn’t stop at loss of productivity and attention to detail, it can include the Employer being vicariously liable for comments made by an employee about another employee online that amount to harassment. To avoid liability, an employer may maintain that the employee was not acting "in the course of employment", but tribunals apply a very wide test to this concept. It is unlikely to be sufficient to defeat the claim by purely stating the offending act took place while an employee was not physically at work or acting under instruction from an employer.


Top Tip: Employers should take all reasonably practicable steps to prevent harassment in or out of the workplace. Appropriate policies and training should therefore clearly indicate to employees that online behaviour at all times should conform to appropriate standards as set out in Bullying & Harassment and/or Equal Opportunities Policies.


LinkedIn is a law unto itself with the problems that are created for employers that encourage its use. The whole nature of LinkedIn is to create a list of an employee's business contacts including, potentially, clients or customers. The question is then, are the details confidential, who do they belong to and what can the employer do to protect such information? Whilst there is still very little case law when it comes to LinkedIn, employers are advised to update post termination restrictions to reference LinkedIn contacts and what employees can and can’t do, together with reviewing contracts of employment to include employee’s responsibilities to return data stored on social media to the employer on termination.


Facebook - Transley v B&Q Employee comment "this place of work is beyond a f**king joke" and that he would soon be "doing some busting". Dismissal was unfair. Unreasonable for the employer to conclude that these comments were a threat to the business, and the relationship between employer and employee was not so damaged that dismissal was necessary.


YouTube - Taylor v Somerfield Stores Ltd 20-second video posted on YouTube by an employee of another employee in uniform being hit over the head with a plastic bag full of other plastic bags in a storeroom. The video received eight hits and the employee took it down, unprompted, after three days.


72


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100