WELCOME TO pitchcare
Political agenda?
It’s a shame when politics get in the way of honest hard work, but the Football League appears to have allowed this to happen to the ‘2015/16 Groundsman of the Year Awards’.
I have written a trilogy of articles over the last twelve months about Shrewsbury Town, the final part of which is in this issue of the magazine.
From a sub-standard, under resourced stadium surface previously, I have worked with Richard Barnett (my number 2 at the stadium) to turn it around to being voted - by referees and visiting managers - as the best pitch in League One.
We were notified that we were in the top 3 pitches in the division before being judged by Dr Stephen Baker of the STRI in April. I’ve known Stephen for over twenty years, meeting him many times at shows, events and seminars as well as being judged by him for this award on a number of occasions in the past.
It seemed strange to me that his first question was what name would I want on the nomination. I am the Head Groundsman on the club website and all correspondence from the Football League this season has come to me.
The question was more bizarre considering that the nomination letter for the award was addressed to me and arrangements for Stephen’s visit were made between him and I.
I suggested the company name (Maxwell Amenity), but he said that wasn’t protocol, so I said it would have to be my name then. “We’ll come back to this later”, he replied. Following the inspection, which took an hour and a half or so, I was asked about the name again as Stephen was leaving. When I said my name, if the company name was taboo, he offered an alternative, “Groundstaff at Shrewsbury Town” which he said was what the Premiership guys were now doing.
Three days after this visit, the Shrewsbury Town Chairman came out onto the pitch, shook my hand and congratulated me on winning the Football League Division One Pitch Award.
Due to a press embargo, the news couldn’t go public until the following week; however, when the results were announced on the Football League website, it was brought to my attention that Richard Barnett’s name was on the Shrewsbury Town Award.
I immediately rang our Chief Executive to ask him to contact the Football League and have the name changed. He said he felt indirectly to blame because he’d had a call from someone from the League the previous Friday who asked the name of the Groundsman who was mostly at the stadium. He’d replied Richard Barnett
because he didn’t really understand the reason for the question.
Despite the Chief Executive’s intervention, the Football League didn’t change the name on the award, but begrudgingly agreed to add mine to it. Does that mean, in future, all groundsmen at pitch winning clubs can have their names on the award as well?
The original press release was not recalled by the Football League, so any publication reproducing the winners/runners up lists contained incorrect information.
Following some email correspondence with Stephen Baker, I had a call from Andy Cole (also STRI), who said he didn’t want Stephen involved and that he would find out what happened and get back to me. Also that same afternoon, I had a call from Simon Barker of the Professional Footballers Association (he is a member of the Pitch Surfaces Committee) to say that he thought it was a genuine mistake.
I am still waiting for Andy Cole to get back to me, and to return my calls, and to answer my emails!
In addition to the STRI and PFA, the Playing Surfaces Committee comprises representatives of the Premier League, Football League and the IOG.
A mistake it certainly wasn’t; and it may require a formal complaint from Shrewsbury Town before we find out the truth and get an apology from the Football League.
What I do know is that it brought a lot of stress to Richard Barnett, who felt guilty and embarrassed when this all kicked off. He’s been a rock these last twelve months (I couldn’t have had a more decent, hardworking person alongside me) and I think it is disgusting that one or more of the representatives of the Playing Surfaces Committee saw fit to play politics over an award that is (or was) worthy of calling itself prestigious.
Cheers, Dave Saltman
“He’s quite scary to work with because he expects incredibly high standards. He’s brilliant with the students; he enjoys passing on all his knowledge to the next generation”
John Rippin, Bodnant Garden
“I’m really proud of what we achieve here, as we haven’t got an abundance of staff, nor a bottomless pit of money but, we’re still getting really good results” Ryan Middleton, Notts Tennis Centre
PC JUNE/JULY 2016 I 1
Say that again!
“I encourage my team to stop and say hello to members and answer any questions they may have”
Ben Kebby, Temple Golf Club
“If it’s raining, we put on a rain suit; if it’s sunny, we put on sun screen. We just get on with it, and handle any problems as they occur”
Jason Hunter, Highfield & Bookham
“I fret about mechanical failures and holes in sheets especially. I can’t think of any black days though. I’m just a worrier and have sleepless nights about things that never happen” Lee Farquhar, Arundel Cricket Club
“Our first comment when we go into a bowls club is that we won’t necessarily save you money, but we’ll make the best use of the money you’ve got” Mike Robertson, Fitz Park Bowling Club
“By the time you read this, the value of my house will have dropped dramatically, my wages will have been slashed, no European produce will be on the supermarket shelves and World War III will be getting underway ... possibly!”
Grasscutter
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156