This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Swiss


Nuclear magnetic resonance has attracted the attention of researchers with a vast array of interests for decades. Anna Demming speaks to Professor Jean-Philippe Ansermet about new demonstrations of how to maximise the potential of the technique, as well as its impact on catalysis, electrochemistry and spintronics


Nuclear magnetic resonance: The signal for a breakthrough


“Imagine I told you that I have a method to observe atoms without disturbing them too much,” says Professor Jean-Philippe Ansermet. “You would understand right away that it is a very powerful tool.” As he explains,


nuclear magnetic resonance


(NMR) is that tool. However, attempts to apply the probe in areas such as catalysis of electrodes and membrane protein analysis have stumbled on difficulties in obtaining sufficient signal strength from samples so much smaller than the usual quantities. “Typically, one looks at more than one millionth of a mole, which is actually a large amount; a 100 trillion atoms, roughly.” Professor Ansermet is a full professor in


the institute of condensed matter physics at Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne. Since the beginning of his research career, he has been fascinated by the possibility of probing molecules at surfaces, typically containing around a hundred times fewer nuclei than a conventional NMR sample. As a result, obtaining an adequate signal strength is far from trivial. Nuclear magnetic resonance measures the


behaviour of the nuclei in atoms and molecules


in a magnetic field. The


measurements provide information about the


electronic environment around the


nuclei and the molecular structure. “It’s a bit like a radar,” explains Professor Ansermet, quoting an older colleague, “You send an electromagnetic signal to your sample and you listen to its response.”


The NMR legacy As early as 1953, just over 10 years after NMR was detected for the first time, Albert W. Overhauser suggested a possible means of enhancing NMR signals. “His idea was, as far as I can tell, the oldest preliminary consideration to what would one day become spintronics,” explains Professor Ansermet. Spintronics refers to a type of spin electronics for which Albert Fert and Peter Grünberg won the 2007 Nobel prize. Professor Ansermet


60 describes the experiment suggested by


Overhauser, a theorist, “The model looks like something Albert Fert would write, exploring the consequences of forcing electron spins out of thermal equilibrium.” The method enhances the signal strength


probed by NMR by exploiting the magnetic moments of electrons, which are 600 times greater than those of the nuclei of hydrogen, for example. The signal


in NMR, which


probes the response of nuclei, is proportional to the magnetization and the magnetic field strength. By transferring the polarization from the electrons to the nuclei it should be possible to improve the signal. The approach is referred to as dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP), and as Professor Ansermet goes on to explain, the history of


Ansermet’s imagination. If the strength of NMR signals from these systems were strong enough, they could shed light on what happens to the molecular structure of a reacting molecule when it sits on a metal surface. “This seemed fascinating to me – a huge challenge, but fascinating.” As it happened, by the 1980s, the idea to


enhance NMR signals by transferring polarisation from the electrons to the nuclei gave way to advances in the technology of the equipment used. “People were gaining signal by increasing the field,” says Professor Ansermet. “They went up and up in field and they let go of the idea of transferring the polarization from the electrons to the nuclei.” It was around 1997 when a professor of electrochemistry paid Professor Ansermet a


this technique is full of surprises. Professor Slichter – one of the founders of magnetic resonance


and Professor Ansermet’s


supervisor during his PhD – demonstrated that Overhauser was right: DNP does work! “I believed there were two famous [magnetic resonance] books,” he recalls from his student years. “One was Abragam’s book and the other Slichter’s book, so to join his group was really exciting.” From the beginning, the idea of using NMR


to probe molecules on surfaces, particularly at the surfaces of a catalyst, caught Professor


visit, saying that he was trying to apply the techniques he had read in a thesis to electrochemistry. The professor was Professor Wieckowski, and although he had not yet realised it, the thesis was Professor Ansermet’s own. Application of NMR in electrochemistry proved hugely difficult as either


the signals were too weak or the


surface areas were huge. “You know if you have to do electrochemistry with one to ten square metres of electrode it’s a problem, a big problem,” explains Professor Ansermet. But with DNP the signals could be enhanced.


Insight Publishers | Projects


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132