This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FIELD SPORTS


that decision when that year’s rip-roaring season yielded 5,000 brace, a figure that was beginning to approach the moor’s 1930s peak. And make no mistake, these are moors that


once threw up huge days. There is a chart in the lodge at Invermark, Lord Dalhousie’s storied stalking and shooting estate, which tells the story more eloquently than I possibly can. On the wall is a chart detailing the annual bags of grouse; 9,600 brace at Millden, 5,000 brace at Huntill, 4,000 brace at Gannochy. Further to the south, Lord Airlie’s moors at Glen Clova and Glen Moy had a day of over 400 brace in the 1960s. That the bags in Angus are getting back


towards those figures is remarkable to anyone with even a passing acquaintance of how the numbers collapsed in the 1980s and 1990s, when the investment fell away and so did the birds. The phenomenal increases in bags in Angus, which now outstrip those in Inverness-shire and the Lammermuirs, have not come without a price tag, however.


Deer out, sheep in By far the most dramatic increases have come in the estates that have employed English grouse expert Mark Osborne, a man with a well-de- served reputation for rescuing struggling grouse moors. Having been employed by John Dodd, a wealthy banker who bought Glenogil estate in 2003 for £4.5m – the estate produced 1,000 brace in the 1970s but the bag had collapsed to single figures due to underinvestment and under-keepering – Osborne was provided with the means and the latitude to do whatever he needed to restore the moor, and fulfilled his brief admirably. Using the same model he used to turn around Lord Lansdowne’s Tullybeagles Estate near Perth, he electric-fenced in the estate and removed the thousands of deer, which were lousy with ticks and which would eat all of the heather on which the grouse depended for cover from raptors. Instead, 3,000 sheep were put onto the moor


to act as tick-mops, and were then constantly dipped throughout the year so the ticks would die when they came into contact with them. The number of keepers was expanded by 500 per cent and the men started hitting the popu- lation of predators (such as foxes, rats, crows and egg-eaters like stoats and weasels), as well as the tick-carrying hares, burning prodigious amounts of heather and carving paths into the hillside to make easier access to the butts and moor. It certainly worked, with the bag rising to


4,000 within six years from a standing start, a remarkable feat. Several neighbours followed Dodd down the Osborne route, and the overall Angus totals began to rise. But at what cost? Many question whether the cost is worth it.


114 WWW.SCOTTISHFIELD.CO.UK


Dodd, who invested heavily before he sold up last year, is reputed to have made a profit from the sale to understated German aristocrat Baron Ferdinand von Baumbach. But what did he leave behind? As one contributor to a debate on the subject


said: ‘The Osborne method is no great secret – kill every predator, burn more heather (as cover from predators is unnecessary), put out medi- cated grit, cut all the birch, rowan up the linns and sit back and watch the grouse flourish in this desert monoculture. Is this really the manage- ment we want for our precious uplands?’ This moorland specialisation needs sacrifices,


and even the elimination of tick has two sides. Walkers might rejoice in exercise on the heather without fear of a tick bite containing potentially crippling Lyme’s disease, true, but on inten- sively-managed moors devoid of deer, hare and other mammals they were the only predators. Fencing deer out of grouse moors has been


controversial. The ‘dun tenants of the waste’ lose their open range. Homing hinds want their calves born where they were born, and cannot get there. Deer, some say, are increasingly having to negotiate a maze of wire tunnels. Biologists might argue that stags’ ability to spread their genes by performing fifty mile route-marches to unrelated hinds, as ‘travellers’ can do in the rut, is compromised, leading to in-breeding. Visually, wire-lines riding ridges replace wild


moorland. We get human moorland rather than the God-given happenstance of beautiful country. The Mountaineering Council of Scot- land representing hill walkers recognises the need to reach remote land to manage it, but would like hill-tracks within a planning frame- work and fence-lines located sensitively. Yet there is also no doubt that even estates


that have not fenced deer out have learnt a great deal from Osborne’s methods, which explains the across-the-board increase in Angus bags. Tick control has tightened thanks to a greater under- standing of how ‘white maggots’ – as sheep were rudely referred to by those with impaired ecolog- ical comprehension in the 1980s – can clear a moor of the sinister, black, blood-sucking para- sites, leaving the grouse to fight another day. Peter Fraser, former head gamekeeper on Inver- cauld Estate, for instance, vividly recalls moors where grouse numbers tumbled the year after the sheep were despatched. The second advance brought about partly by


Osborne is medicated grit. Grit helps grouse grind and digest rough heather, their primary food, in their gut. By putting out piles of grit medicated to kill strongyle worms in grouse intestines, moors can eliminate the worm burden that exposed populations to extreme cycles. Hugo Straker of the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust believes


‘The rise in Scottish grouse bags undoubtedly has other social benefits too’


KIRSTEN SCHEUERL / ALAMY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164  |  Page 165  |  Page 166  |  Page 167  |  Page 168  |  Page 169  |  Page 170  |  Page 171  |  Page 172  |  Page 173  |  Page 174  |  Page 175  |  Page 176  |  Page 177  |  Page 178  |  Page 179  |  Page 180  |  Page 181  |  Page 182  |  Page 183  |  Page 184  |  Page 185  |  Page 186  |  Page 187  |  Page 188  |  Page 189  |  Page 190  |  Page 191  |  Page 192  |  Page 193  |  Page 194  |  Page 195  |  Page 196  |  Page 197  |  Page 198  |  Page 199  |  Page 200  |  Page 201  |  Page 202  |  Page 203  |  Page 204  |  Page 205  |  Page 206  |  Page 207  |  Page 208  |  Page 209  |  Page 210  |  Page 211  |  Page 212  |  Page 213  |  Page 214  |  Page 215  |  Page 216  |  Page 217  |  Page 218  |  Page 219  |  Page 220  |  Page 221  |  Page 222  |  Page 223  |  Page 224  |  Page 225  |  Page 226  |  Page 227  |  Page 228  |  Page 229  |  Page 230  |  Page 231  |  Page 232  |  Page 233  |  Page 234  |  Page 235  |  Page 236  |  Page 237  |  Page 238  |  Page 239  |  Page 240  |  Page 241  |  Page 242  |  Page 243  |  Page 244  |  Page 245  |  Page 246  |  Page 247  |  Page 248  |  Page 249  |  Page 250  |  Page 251  |  Page 252  |  Page 253  |  Page 254  |  Page 255  |  Page 256  |  Page 257  |  Page 258  |  Page 259  |  Page 260  |  Page 261  |  Page 262  |  Page 263  |  Page 264  |  Page 265  |  Page 266  |  Page 267  |  Page 268  |  Page 269  |  Page 270  |  Page 271  |  Page 272  |  Page 273  |  Page 274  |  Page 275  |  Page 276  |  Page 277  |  Page 278  |  Page 279  |  Page 280  |  Page 281  |  Page 282  |  Page 283  |  Page 284  |  Page 285  |  Page 286