This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
ANDREW MAIN WILSON: THE VALUE OF A QUALITY MBA HAS NEVER BEEN MORE IMPORTANT


AMBA’s Chief Executive Andrew Main Wilson talks about the value of an AMBA accredited MBA and advises potential new MBA students on choosing the right programme


Over 40,000 MBA students graduate from AMBA accredited schools each year and one of AMBA’s ongoing priorities is to fully support its graduate members during the next stages of their careers, helping them network with fellow MBAs and linking them with employers worldwide.


Whilst steadfastly maintaining its discerning Accreditation Standards, AMBA continues to grow its Business Schools portfolio. The organisation currently accredits 210 business schools in 52 countries and territories. These schools collectively offer over 750 MBA, DBA (Doctor of Business Administration) and MBM (Master of Business in Management) programmes in more than 80 countries. AMBA’s increasing global portfolio means that students from all over the world have more choice in choosing a high quality programme, abroad, or closer to home.


The value which Business School leaders place on the international recognition which AMBA can provide for their programmes remains an essential differentiator in a competitive market. The same is true for MBA graduates.


Andrew Main Wilson, AMBA’s Chief Executive, explains why it is important for potential MBA and business postgraduate students to choose an AMBA accredited programme: “In an increasingly competitive global world, the value of a quality MBA has, in my opinion, never been more important.” Main Wilson says: “When I graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce business degree in the UK, I was up against the very best UK university students trying to gain an international marketing job in a major multinational. I succeeded, but today that competition would be fought amongst global students, not just from your country or even your continent. That’s also true when you are aiming for a more senior post within most organisations.”


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122