This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
FX MONETARY POLICY


versus the periphery over the last decade. This view could also entail a competitiveness loss in the Euro area versus the rest of the world, as higher overall inf lation could erode the competitiveness of northern Europe (under the assumption of a stable nominal exchange rate). This is where the debate over ‘good’ and ‘bad’ def lation links up with the discussion over the Euro area current account surplus. The ‘bad’ def lation camp wants that current account surplus to fall as Germany imports more from the p er i p h er y and


loses


competitiveness vis-à-vis the rest of the world. The ‘good’ def lation camp argues


that the


German current account surplus hardly comes at the expense of the periphery or intra-European adjustment and therefore wants to preserve it.


The debate over ‘good’ and ‘bad’ deflation links up with the discussion over the Euro area current account surplus


And it is hard to dispute that structural reform in the periphery needs


to aggressively.


Like in most economic debates, there is merit to both sides. Of course, strong German competitiveness and the German


46 FX TRADER MAGAZINE January - March 2014 be pursued more Indeed, periphery


gains in price competitiveness have often lagged impressive gains in wage competitiveness because product markets in the periphery still suffer from barriers to entry.


current account surplus hardly prevent the periphery from pursuing needed structural reforms.


Economy Minister pointed


Indeed, as Spain’s out


at the end of December, strong German growth indirectly benefits manufacturing in the periphery via Europe’s manufacturing chain.


At the same time, there are good reasons to support the case of the ‘bad’ def lation camp. First, although periphery interest rates have


fallen since the famous


“whatever it takes” sentence from Draghi in July 2012, there is little doubt that nominal and real interest rates in the periphery remain very high. Periphery d e f l a t ion would raise real interest rates, un w in d in g some of the recent progress in


easing


fi n an c i a l c ond i t ion s . Second, Japan’s experience in recent years shows


that


c u r re nc y markets tend to reward high real interest rates with a stronger exchange rate. Def lation


in


the Euro area and rising real rates


could


result in higher EUR/USD, tightening financial conditions on a broader basis even further (and beyond the periphery). Third, the kind of internal devaluation seen in Ireland may simply not be politically feasible in the rest of the periphery. There is little doubt that resistance to further


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89