This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Warwick Business School’s Dr Girts Racko attributes the surprising results to the fact that when there are few men in an occupation, women have more chance to get to the top and earn more. But where there are more equal numbers of men and women working in an occupation the men dominate the high-paying jobs.


“Higher overall segregation tends to reduce male advantage and improve the position of women,” said Dr Racko.


“The greater the degree of overall segregation, the less the possibility exists for discrimination against


The 20 countries were: Country


Slovenia Mexico Hungary Brazil


South Africa USA Sweden Spain Finland Portugal Denmark Russia UK


South Korea Switzerland Germany Netherlands Austria Czech Japan


Difference in Pay Between Sexes (Correlated Figure, in Order)


–.177 ( minus - ie women earn more) +.011 +.034 +.110 +.120 +.207 +.220 +.334 +.339 +.359 +.371 +.374 +.388 +.408 +.410 +.420 +.430 +.462 +.491 +.519


Work Segregation Between Sexes (Correlated Figure)


.692 .717 .690 .704 .641 .667 .709 .725 .767 .724 .747 .707 .677 .693 .623 .700 .633 .609 .644 .655


women and so there is more scope for women to develop progressive careers.


“For instance, within nursing men disproportionately fill the senior positions...but the fewer the number of male nurses, the more the senior positions must be filled by women.


“Perhaps our most important finding is that, at least for these industrially developed countries, overall segregation and the vertical [pay gap] dimension are inversely related. The higher the overall segregation, the lower the advantage to men. This is directly contrary to popular assumptions.”


The research, published in the journal Sociology today [Tuesday December 18], compared the degree to which men and women are working in different professions with the gap between their pay.


Dr Racko, Professor Robert Blackburn, of the University of Cambridge, and Dr Jennifer Jarman, of Lakehead, used statistics for each country on the proportion of women and men in each occupation, and the overall average gap in pay. They correlated these to show the relationships between workplace segregation of the sexes and the gap in their pay.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60