This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
HEADLINES


couple of instances,” said James Bosco, the principal investigator of CoSN’s Participatory Learning Leadership & Policy Initiative and a professor at Western Michigan University. “But typically, bills are extremely restrictive.” He gave the example of Missouri, which drafted a bill recent-


ly that would have outlawed all forms of social networking in the school environment. Te state teachers association filed an injunction, arguing that the legislation unfairly targeted technol- ogy that is growing in prevalence in classroom instruction. “Tose rules were changed,” Bosco added. “Te issue is we don’t


get to choose the world we live in. It might have been a better world 50 years ago according to some people. But the technol- ogy will continue to exist, and the use of social networking will continue to rise. Te question is: how are we going to deal with it?” Bosco said additional challenges arise when school attempt to


prohibit schools from bringing cell phones to school, including how to screen the students. Do schools use metal detectors? Do resource offices pat down individual students? And what about the increasing number of parents who supply these mobile de- vices to their children with the purpose of being able to track them throughout the day? “We don’t have enough resources (to ban mobile technology),


so why not use technology for teaching and learning?” he con- tinued. “You can use cell phones to video bad things on the bus


or on the playground but you can also use it to video something for learning on a field trip. Every technology brings both positive and negative aspects to our lives. Go down the line of any tech- nology starting with fire. Tis is no exception.” Instead, he said the CoSN work group found limiting the use


of cell phones and social networking in school was implau- sible. Rather, he suggested that increased social responsibility of administrators, teachers, student transporters and parents is necessary to better teach children the acceptable uses of the technology in the school environment. “To get someone to write a code of conduct and file it at dis-


trict level or to write a law in the state legislature totally misses the point,” Bosco added. “We have to get the school community to accept responsibility for their behavior and to become stake- holders on what is acceptable and what is not acceptable. Tey become part of the mechanism that helps to enforce this. We have talked about all school districts having acceptable use of Internet resources. Let’s call it responsible use instead.” FirstGroup’s Richmond said knee-jerk responses are “foolish.” “We have to change and adapt with (the technology),” she


added. “From a school bus provider perspective, we have to work with our partners. We have to address this head on, and we also need to educate the students and own kids on how to best use this technology.” ■


Safeguarding Your Children with Photo Enforcement Solutions


Redflex Student Guardian™ is a fully automated photo enforcement solution for monitoring and deterring drivers who illegally pass school buses, risking the safety and security of your students.


GET THE FACTS | www.RedflexStudentGuardian.com No Upfront Costs • 100% Violator Funded • Legally Compliant & Defensible


See Us At Booth # 254 36 School Transportation News Magazine July 2012


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100