This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
container ships


Tapping new technologies for more efficient TEU transport


Gas fuel and propulsor developments are exploited in new ship designs for feeder and longhaul trades, targeting higher operating economy and emissions compliance


by Doug Woodyard


and yards. Germanischer Lloyd and Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering (DSME) last year demonstrated the feasibility of running large tonnage on LNG, with GL approving in principle a 14,000 TEU vessel for the Korean group. “New technology is needed as cleaner transport is increasingly demanded and maritime environmental regulations are becoming ever stricter,” explains Frederick Ebers, GL’s vice president and area manager for North East Asia. “DSME and GL have acknowledged this challenge and agreed in 2010 to jointly start exploring technology options and safety concepts for large LNG-fuelled container vessels.” Most technical systems have since been developed and examined and the major challenge lies in how to apply the technologies, especially in ensuring safe bunkering procedures, reports Dr Gerd-Michael Wuersig, deputy head of GL’s Environmental Research department and a member of the IMO’s group for developing the Code for Gas as Ship Fuel (IGF-Code): “You have to guarantee there is no gas spill and that protection measures against incidents and collisions are sufficient. Relevant solutions are under evaluation and will be available soon.” Meanwhile, he added, there is no need to hesitate in building vessels on the basis


S of


interim guidelines MSC.285(86) because LNG- fuelled tonnage built according to these will certainly be allowed to operate even if the IGF- Code is enforced.


The IMO’s controls on the sulphur content of marine fuels from 2015 and its requirements from 2016 for 80 per cent reductions in NOx emissions compared with the 2010 level will make conventional fuel unattractive, Dr Wuersig suggests. But LNG can be an environmentally and economically sound option, its high efficiency


www.mpropulsion.com


ignificant interest in gas-fuelled container ships is reflected in a number of projects involving leading classification societies


COFFERDAM


H O L D D.L.W.L D.L.W.L


B.L. DB W.B.TK P.D. DB W.B.TK Midship section of Daewoo’s BV-approved 14,000 TEU gas-powered container ship


and lower impact promising a new era: “LNG- fuelled cargo ships will emerge on a large scale in the latter half of this decade,” he predicts. “And there is great potential for container ships to become one of the first types using LNG as fuel.” An agreement between GL and Japanese shipbuilder IHI Marine United will pursue a conceptual study for a 13,000 TEU LNG-fuelled vessel. IHIMU launched its 13000C design in 2010, with GL reviewing the main hull structure. A new joint project focuses on the LNG fuelling system, which embraces the bunker station, tanks, gas preparation and gas lines. IHIMU is designing the key elements of the system, with GL undertaking the design review, hazard identification and – on successful completion of the project – approval in principle. Assessing the safety performance of


the


gas supply system will be the key aspect of GL’s contribution.


Approval in principle has been granted by another major classification society, Bureau Veritas, for the basic design of a 14,000 TEU container ship to be powered by LNG. The design was developed in a joint industry project by DSME, liner major CMA-CGM and BV. “The market will determine when these


ships can be ordered and built, but this is a real milestone as for the first time we have a fully worked and approved design for a mainline ultra-large container ship running on LNG,” says BV deputy technical director Jean- Francois Segretain. “After an in-depth HAZID analysis we can say with confidence that there are no technical or safety barriers to introducing LNG as a fuel for


Marine Propulsion I February/March 2012 I 27


B.L


W.W.B.TK PASS


PASS W.W.B.TK


No.1 LNG Fuel TK (T&S)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132