This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
emissions


Shipyards are lined up to support the installation of Wärtsilä SOx scrubbers; illustrated is a system arranged alongside the funnel of a Neste product tanker


Yard deal supports scrubber projects


An agreement with Finnish and Dutch yards will facilitate the installation of Wärtsilä scrubbers in a wider market. BLRT group yards at Klaipeda, Tallinn and Turku and Shipdock yards at Harlingen and Amsterdam are now able to offer design, engineering, installation and commissioning services to support customers specifying the SOx-reducing systems. Significantly reduced installation times are promised by applying planning and strong project management and providing prefabricated parts. “Wärtsilä is committed to offering a total


package that includes all sides of installing SOx abatement technology,” asserts Henk de Jong, Benelux Wärtsilä service unit director. Further


agreements with several more


yards in Northern Europe are planned by the Finnish group, which teamed up with Helsinki- based Metso Corp in 2005 to develop a marine scrubber. A prototype of the Wärtsilä SOx scrubber was successfully tested on the Finnish product tanker Suula from 2008 to 2010, the first commercial order following soon after completion of the trials. In this fresh water system, an alkaline solution of caustic soda (sodium hydroxide) is circulated in a closed loop to wash the exhaust gases, the sulphur oxides dissolving in the wash-water and neutralised by the caustic soda. The pH of the water is increased to the point where the water itself reacts with the SOx to form sulphates.


Scrubbers or low sulphur fuel?


The results of a study intended to help ship operators decide whether to switch to low sulphur fuels in Emission Control Areas or install a scrubber and continue burning high sulphur heavy fuel oil are available for free download (www.socp.us).


The guide was developed by Seattle-based naval architects Glosten and Associates in


www.mpropulsion.com


conjunction with the Washington, DC-based Ship Operators Co-operative


Program


(SOCP), with the financial support of SOCP and MARAD.


It aims to help operators understand emission requirements, calculate potential costs and assess the technical and operational challenges of various scrubber technologies.


Sections summarise the pros and cons of the different technologies, and an extensive appendix provides manufacturers’ technical details of their systems. SOCP members can log in at the website to access the guide while non-members need to e-mail a request. MP


Acknowledgement: ABS Marine Propulsion I February/March 2012 I 103


Particulates, oil and other materials trapped in the waste water are removed in an emulsion- breaking, flotation-type cleaning system, and the cleaned water containing the sulphates is released to the sea. Since sea water already contains sulphates, and the pH of the waste water is close to the average for the natural environment, the discharge meets the IMO’s wash-water guidelines.


A small bleed-off continuously extracted from the closed loop is cleaned of any impurities for safe discharge overboard or, in special cases, for


transfer to a holding tank. SOx in the exhaust gases is thus effectively neutralised into harmless sulphates that occur naturally in sea water.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132