Automated Parking Systems Receiving City Approvals
Editor’s note: Although automated parking systems have been marketed in the U.S. for nearly a decade, there have been a number of
stumbling blocks for manufacturers. One of the major issues has been in receiving approvals from local fire and building departments. This issue has lessened substantially in the past couple of years. Having systems installed in major metropolitan areas such as Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, Washington, DC, and Boston is extremely important to this segment of the parking industry. This article is taken from Build LA, the monthly newsletter of the LA Department of Building and Safety.
By Robert R. “Bud” Ovrom,
The UCLA Ziman Center for Real Estate hosted a work-
shop in mid-October on automated parking structures as a possible solution for high-density parking. [Ovrom was a participant in a pan- el discussion moderated by Donald Shoup, UCLA Professor of Urban Planning.] Although Los Angeles had
approved two- and three-car “lifts” for many years, fully auto- mated systems had not achieved our high level of safety standards, until recently, when the city approved two automated parking structures – a 15-car fully automat- ed lift in the Valley and a 17-car facility in Chinatown. Although these two units are
small, they are still very signifi- cant, because they are the first of a new generation of automated parking structures to be construct- ed in Los Angeles. A 708-car parking complex for
a proposed 283-unit apartment project in Century City is going through the entitlement process. The EIR [environmental impact report] is being done with and without automated parking. The developer’s preference is automated. Although automated parking is now fairly common in Asia
and Europe, it has been slower to catch on, and to get approved by regulatory agencies, in the U.S., particularly in Los Angeles. By working closely with the LA Fire and Building and Safety
departments, manufacturers of different automated technologies are now addressing the city’s structural and life-safety concerns. Under the right circumstances for design and economic
considerations, an automated parking structure can have many advantages for developers – less land consumed; less space constructed; more environmentally sensitive; safer, greater handicap accessibility; and less building density/visual bulk, just to name a few. For the city, the bottom line, of course, is safety. On a case-
by-case review, the city will be looking at the fire-life safety of the overall building (exiting, fire sprinklers, fire-rated partitions, fire
Parking Today
www.parkingtoday.com
rating); access for fire suppression; method of water application; venting of smoke and heat; safety of personnel while fighting a fire; and early warning notification system. Although the city has studied a variety of parking systems
(tower crane, rack-and-rail and automated guided vehicles), we have not, and will not, give a blanket endorsement to any specific technologies. There is never likely to ever be a “one size fits all” approach. Instead, we are open-minded about looking at differ- ent solutions for different situations. Most important, we do believe that by working together we
can find win-win designs and that automated parking now has the potential to be a “game-changer” for many future projects in the city of Los Angeles.
Robert R. “Bud” Ovrom, Manager of the LA Department of Building and Safety can be reached through
www.ladbs.org.
PT 31
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56