This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
The Case of the Faulty Circuit By Larry Donoghue


One of my airport clients called me asking for some help. One cashier was consistently having a lower average


parking transaction fee than the other cashiers. Also, each day he worked, there would be about 10 to 12 unaccounted for tickets in that parking lot. The airport was of the belief that he was steal- ing, but they couldn’t figure out how he was doing it. I made a trip to the airport to inspect the cashier booths


and the revenue control equipment. This particular cashier worked the evening shift in a remote parking lot. An analog counter in the booth was activated by the reset loop located just beyond the exit barrier gate. Each time a vehicle made an exit, the counter would increase the reading by a count of one. It was working perfectly. The cashiers were required to record on their shift reports


the opening and closing numbers of transactions rung up, and the opening and closing numbers of the analog counter. I checked several of this particular cashier’s recent shift reports, and they all showed the number of exits matched the number of transactions. There were two booths in the lot, and the suspect cashier


always worked in booth No. 1. He earned this right by virtue of his seniority. I spoke to the night supervisor about this cashier. He told


me he was always on time, never failed to show up for his shift. He was personable. But he had one quirk, the supervisor said. Much of the time he worked in the booth, this particular cashier would have its interior light turned off. None of the other cashiers did that. The cashiers didn’t have a choice of parking lots, only a


choice of booths. I suggested that this cashier be assigned to one of the other parking lots for about two weeks to see if his new lot similarly had about 10 to 12 unaccounted for tickets. After he switched lots, the


unaccounted for tickets in his new lot did not increase. Those in the remote parking lot was cut to only one or two a day. With this infor- mation, I made a second trip to the airport and spent some time in booth No. 1 during the evening shift. The suspect cashier was not on duty that night. I tested all the equipment,


action. When the next parking patron came to his booth, he would tell them to wait just a moment. He would then take a steel plate that was about 9” x 12” and enclosed in a black-colored envelope to match the dark asphalt pavement and place it on a corner of the reset loop. The cashier would then get back in the booth and collect the


parking fee from the patron. He would not ring up the transac- tion; he would merely wave the patron out. Because the steel plate was on the reset loop, the gate would not lower. He would then handle several more fraudulent transactions and remove the plate during a lull in exiting. The cashier was a man of his word. He reimbursed the air-


port $21,500 plus interest. He had not spent the money. He had kept it all in a savings account in a bank. This was a freak situation where the interior light and the


counter were on the same circuit. However, there are many other ways for cashiers to commit fraud that requires them to exit the booth to do so: • If the exit barrier gate housing is unlocked, they flip


He would then take a steel plate that was about 9” x 12”and place it on a corner of the reset loop.


most particularly the counter, to see if it was working properly. Everything I tested up to that point worked properly. Then I asked the cashier if it was OK with her if I turned off the booth’s interior light. She didn’t object, so I turned it off. At that point, I noticed the count on the counter was not


increasing when a vehicle made an exit. I turned the light back on and the count increased each time a vehicle exited the lane. I reported my findings to the airport. When the suspect cashier was confronted with this informa-


tion, he said that if the airport wouldn’t prosecute him, he would tell them what he was doing and he would make full restitution. The airport agreed to his terms. The cashier told them that when he was going to steal some money, he would turn off the light to put the counter out of


18


the switch that is inside the housing and raise the gate and leave it up for several fraudu- lent transactions. • They remove the barrier


gate arm using a pair of pliers to loosen four bolts and slide the gate arm out of the attach- ment bracket. • They remove the shear pin


that runs through the attachment bracket and through the drive shaft that the attachment bracket is mounted on. Once the shear pin is removed, the gate arm and


attachment bracket can be slid off the drive shaft. The best defense against fraud in the exit lane is to have a


CCTV camera on a pole upstream of the cashier’s booth that uses an electronic recording media. Once a month, the recording for a full shift of each cashier should be reviewed. The recording should be run at high speed until the cashier


is detected exiting the booth. At this point, review the tape at slow speed so that the cashier’s actions can be readily discerned. If any improper actions are detected, the cashier should receive appro- priate disciplinary action.


Larry Donoghue, President of Larry Donoghue and Associates, can be reached at ldonogh@aol.com.


PT Parking Today www.parkingtoday.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56