This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Nursing Home Litigation


Appellate Watch


Cary J. Hansel


753-778 Stewart J. Levitas v. Sherza Warren


David A. Carter (410) 244-5800 Civil Procedure


Te Honorable Alfred Nance Circuit Court for Baltimore City


In this lead paint case, summary judgment was granted in favor of the defense in 1998. Almost 15 years after that lawsuit was filed, a second lawsuit was filed by the same plaintiff alleging the same exposure to lead paint by the same parties. Te defense moved for summary judgment on res judicata grounds and the plaintiff moved to revise the earlier judgment. Te trial court vacated the earlier judgment on the grounds that the plaintiff was a minor at the time it was entered. Te question is whether the plaintiff’s minority constitutes a “fraud, mistake or irregularity” under the applicable rules for setting aside judgments.


754-1010 Pro-Football, Inc. t/a Te Washington Redskins v. Dominique Stevenson


David O. Godwin, Jr. (410) 418-8778 Civil Procedure/Workers’ Compensation


Te Honorable Dwight D. Jackson Circuit Court for Prince George’s County


Te appellee, a professional football player, alleged to have sustained an accidental injury on the job during a game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Te Redskins franchise argues on appeal that compensation for the injuries was precluded by the statute of limitations. Although the claim was filed 6 months after the 2-year statute of limitations had run, the player alleges that the team’s failure to file a report of the accidental injury with the Maryland Commission tolled the statute of limitations. Te team claims that its prior reporting in Virginia should excuse the failure to report in Maryland.


755-1434 Collegiate Group, LLC v. City of College Park


Richard C. Daniels (301) 864-1100 Land Use


Te Honorable Julia B. Weatherly Circuit Court for Prince George’s County


Te City of College Park sought to frustrate the appellant’s ability to operate a residential rental building by denying the validity of a County-issued use and occupancy permit and insisting that the appellant obtain another permit despite the fact that the County itself took no issue with the use and occupancy of the property under the permit it had issued. Among other issues on appeal, the appellant notes that the city is without the power to either conclusively interpret or enforce the County use and occupancy permit requirements.


756-1538 David S. Schuman v. Greenbelt Homes, Inc.


J.P. Szymkowicz (202) 862-8500 Civil Procedure/Torts


Te Honorable Albert W. Northrop Circuit Court for Prince George’s County


Te plaintiff sued a housing cooperative claiming that second- hand smoke from his neighbor’s unit was emanating in to his unit and causing him severe discomfort. Te plaintiff appeals from the denial of his motion for a preliminary injunction. Among other things, the plaintiff challenges the trial court’s finding that second- hand smoke causes no “real injury,” other than foul odor despite evidence of the Surgeon General’s findings to the contrary.


Trial Reporter / Fall 2011 51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60
Produced with Yudu - www.yudu.com