PESTICIDES? Thinking about
When it comes to controlling troublesome weeds, pests and diseases in the sports turfgrass areas you manage, how much do you think about the products you use?
TOO often managers just buy what their adviser recommends, place the delivered product in store and wait for a licensed spray operator to apply it when conditions are suitable.
In fact, it is worth taking the time to understand what is in the product and how it has been developed. It is essential to know about its registration and you really should know whether it is right for your needs.
Protecting sports turfgrass
Over the years pesticides - or more correctly plant protection products - have made significant contributions towards establishing and maintaining safe, high quality sports turfgrass. They have helped to effectively manage populations of insect pests and disease causing organisms as well as weeds. The result is improvements in both the appearance and playing qualities of turf swards. Plant protection products are an important component of the Greenkeeper’s and Groundsman’s ‘tool box’.
Product contents
Plant protection products are specifically formulated to achieve control of specific weeds, pests or diseases. Each product contains one or more substances (active ingredients) that are active against the target. Highly trained formulation scientists combine these with other substances to achieve desirable characteristics in the finished product e.g. effectiveness, ease of use, reduced packaging and no hazard classification.
How active substances are brought to the market
1. Discovery phase
Identifying a potential active substance is the first step. Each year, research based companies screen many thousands of potential candidates for useful activity. Some candidates may have been synthesised in the laboratory, others may come from natural sources. As well as assessing pest activity, early stage tests will also assess safety for users and the wider environment. On average, just one out of 70,000 candidates will emerge from the screening process and go to the development phase.
2. Development phase
Selection continues in the development phase with many more candidates failing to meet the rigid selection criteria of
activity and safety in more extensive tests. The few that do emerge are then incorporated into a range of formulations that are tested further in strictly controlled early field trials. Again, the criteria are effectiveness and safety, but under a range of different environmental conditions. These trials continue for several years to investigate activity against target pests, weeds and diseases and to achieve the best results using different application methods. The tests will provide experience of the product’s performance in different seasons and in weather conditions. Plant protection products for sports and turfgrass will be subject to specific trials on suitable areas that reflect commercial use.
From the first time an active substance is discovered to the first sale takes on average 9.1 years ... and the average cost is £140m
Alongside the turfgrass testing, extensive toxicological and environmental studies are completed along with assessments of any breakdown products. Safety and stability of the formulated product in the final pack is needed.
3. Registration
Before a plant protection product can be sold in a particular country it must be approved by the relevant national regulatory agency. All the data generated over the years of trials and studies are submitted for evaluation by the agency which decides whether or not to grant the approval.
Time and costs
From the first time an active substance is discovered to the first sale takes on average 9.1 years and only one out of 139,000 candidates screened will make it to the market. And the average cost is
£140 million (Source: Pesticides in Perspective, published by Crop Protection Association, May 2007).
Conclusion
Plant protection products represent a massive investment in development and registration. The process is highly complex and represents a high economic risk to the research company. The
By DR MIKE DRINKALL, Technical Specialist, Dow AgroSciences
Development field trial of MasalonTM
fungicide to confirm effectiveness control of Michrodochium (Fusarium) patch
turfgrass
weeks apart were used; this photograph was taken 38 days after the second application
products are highly tested and regulated.
Even after registration independent scrutiny will continue to assess any risks once the product is in practical use. To ensure they continue to be available for tomorrow’s turfgrass manager those using them today need to ensure they act responsibly. This includes correct and legal product selection, measuring accurately the area to be treated, applying the right amount of product at the right time and checking application equipment before use and that it is correctly calibrated.
15
Control of Michrodochium (Fusarium) patch in a development field trial achieved by MasalonTM compared with an untreated plot. Two applications of Masalon applied four
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104