WELCOME TO pitchcare
The best in the world ...
IT is always difficult writing this editorial three weeks before publication and, so, my nick name of ‘Deadline Dave’ proves justified as I try to be as current as possible. Unfortunately, the World Cup will be in the knockout stages when you read this. So, let’s hope England are still involved!
No doubt the state of the South African pitches will have been commented on and, in the main, I have welcomed the increased media discussion about our sports surfaces over the last decade.
This issue of the magazine - our 5th anniversary, by the way - will be delivered in the middle of a hectic and high profile summer of sport. Already in the media spotlight will have been the AEGON Tennis Championship at Queens, the opening Test of the summer at Lord’s, The Derby at Epsom, Royal Ascot and, as this issue thumps onto your doormat, we will be enjoying the All England Lawn Tennis Championships from Wimbledon.
Messrs. Kimpton, Hunt, Whybrow, Gilford and Seaward will have delivered superb surfaces fit for the intended sport, whilst Ken Siems at Loch Lomond, Gordon Moir at St. Andrews, and Jim McKenzie at Celtic Manor will be flying the greenkeepers’ flag further into the summer. Throw in all the groundsmen at the cricket venues up and down the country hosting ODIs, T20s and Test matches, and never has our industry had such a high media profile.
However, the more recent debates have been born out of the inability to get our iconic ‘home of football’ stadium pitch right.
You could say that the Wembley project was doomed from the start, with the Football Association promising one thing and the builders, Multiplex, clearly failing to deliver! Ongoing litigation is due to be heard in High Court early in 2011 - possibly! Where Wembley is concerned, you never quite know.
So, three and a half years after the stadium eventually opened, horribly late and massively over budget, what has changed at the home of football? Well, the pitch has - eleven times to be exact. The schedule of extra curricular events continues to plague the surface and the levels of criticism have become louder and more vociferous.
Following the end of season Cup semi finals, finals and league play-offs, players and managers were united in their
condemnation. “Worse than many non- league pitches”; “scandalous”; “very poor” and “no excuse” were bandied about in the national press. PFA chief executive, Gordon Taylor, said: “The pitch is a big concern.” “It ruined the [FA Cup] final,” said Chelsea and England’s John Terry. “It’s probably the worst pitch we’ve played on all year.”
However, Sir Trevor Brooking, the FA’s director of football development, denied that the use of the stadium for non- football events was a major factor, whilst the then FA chairman, Lord Triesman, before his fall from grace, insisted “Wembley’s pitch problems are over.”
So, there you have it - a bugger’s muddle of the highest order.
England are bidding to host the World Cup in 2018 and noises from FIFA are positive, But, and it’s a big but, if the Wembley pitch continues to receive bad press, will that affect the awarding of this prestigious tournament?
And, where does it leave the reputation of our industry?
The UK has some of the most highly respected Groundsmen in the world. Paul Burgess recently delivered a stunning playing surface for the Champions League final between Bayern Munich and Inter Milan, at Real Madrid’s Bernabéu Stadium - and that at the end of an intense La Liga. Chris Hague works a multi-use pitch in Copenhagen, with a similar event schedule to Wembley, and on a budget!
The majority of the top-flight stadium pitches in the UK are a joy to behold, but the ongoing and highly newsworthy saga of Wembley and ‘that’ pitch negate that good work.
If anyone at Wembley reads this article, please take note. Employ a Groundsman with experience at this level, give him autonomy and an open cheque book and let him answer to one person, preferably the Chief Executive. Allow that person to attend all concept, pre and de-brief meetings to provide his expert advice and that way the surface can be managed correctly. All the science is a wonderful tool, but nothing beats good practical experience and decision making, all of which is based on event schedules and the day to day assessment of the turf.
Our industry deserves better! Cheers
Dave Saltman
Say that again!
“After all, it’s hard to get a mower through a roof” Clive Baker, British Security Industry
“We manage to provide a county standard ground on a club budget”
Roger Ward, Horsham Cricket Club
Poor green performance is usually the result of restricting the maintenance programme to suit the golfers rather than being an indication of bad greenkeeping or agronomy
The Fantastic Four
“We have been known to row a boat across six fairways without touching dry land”
Martyn Savident, La Grande Mare
“There’s a place for figures and science in the industry, but you can’t always go by the book, sometimes you have to deal with matters as they come up”
Nigel Whybrow, Epsom Racecourse
“In our opinion, backlapping should be banned as the carborundum paste is environmentally unsound”
Patrick Callaby and Peter Hampton
“I’m relying on a retired farmer for help - at least he can drive a tractor!”
Paul Fiske, Aberdeen FC
“We have to help ourselves in this industry, if we don’t work together, we’ll be all the poorer for it”
Darren Baldwin, Tottenham Hotspur FC
“We need to understand that we may not just be part of the problem we may actually BE the problem!”
Frank Newberry, Trainer and Conference Speaker
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132