78 | L AST WORD |
W:
www.universitybusiness.co.uk | T: @UB_UK
Creating a place for innovation
Today’s learning spaces are environments – and technology can only enhance what’s there, says Lenovo Worldwide Education Executive, Sam Morris. So, where does that leave higher education?
“B
anned unless required.” That was the
recommendation shared last
month in an article entitled: Why Clay Shirky Banned Laptops, Tablets and Phones from His Classroom*. It was writen by one of the world’s leading teachers of, and experts on, the socio-economic effects of internet technologies. This view captures the current conflict
between students and faculty. It also reveals the tension behind any dialogue about the role of ICT in HE – particularly, when talk turns to enhancing learning spaces and the student experience. So, let’s dive right in. Today’s students are coming to campus
with devices that are made as much for entertainment as productivity. And they use them for both purposes – often at the same time. Streaming movies? Check. Interacting on social networks? Check. Taking notes in class? Check. Researching tomorrow’s paper? Check. Laptops, smartphones and tablets are
all part of the new normal in HE. Yes, they can be a distraction – but they’re not the sole cause of disengagement. Technology itself is not a problem, or a cure: course content; the quality of teaching, and the expectations of face- to-face learning will always count more. Rewind 20 years, and the big
innovation was installing a landline in every dorm room. Conventional wisdom also dictated that faculty was the source of all knowledge, and students were simply there to absorb it. Technology has flipped both notions on their heads. The practicalities of enabling the
connected learning experience; of providing secure access to information across locations, devices, platforms and screens; of fostering a culture of collaboration and innovation are forcing a fundamental change in approach – both physically and figuratively. Bolting chairs to the ground in a
forward-facing layout has become impractical in a NODES model of conversational learning. Libraries have started sprouting smaller study areas, equipped with the
*Source:
pbs.com
infrastructure of the boardroom to connect students to each other and critical content. And lecturers have had to evolve from delivering one-way monologues to embracing real-time feedback and peer instruction. In his article, Clay Shirky went on to
write: ‘Against oppositional models of teaching and learning, both negative – “Concentrate, or lose out!” – and positive – “Let me atract your atention!” – I’m coming to see student focus as a collaborative process. It’s me and them working to create a classroom where the students who want to focus have the best shot at it, in a world increasingly hostile to that goal.’ This is where
the biggest enhancements to learning spaces apply: creating inspiring ‘environments’ beyond the lecture hall to meet the real needs of students – not the set demands of curricula. High-speed internet? Check. Ancillary kit? Check. Cloud services? Check. Technological horsepower? Check. It’s an extension
of the ‘maker’ mentality: the
institution provides students with the right tools and the required freedom to incubate ideas – from conception to reality. Knowledge is useless, unless we do something with it, which is increasingly what 21st-century employers want graduates to demonstrate. For most HE institutions, this shift
“Rewind 20 years, and the big innovation was installing a
landline in every dorm room”
is inevitable. And many are already making the capital investments needed to help their students take control of their own development through self-driven initiatives. Such activities might not earn them academic credit; but they lead to outcomes of more tangible value: positive energy and personal results. Enhancing learning
spaces starts with re-imagining them as learning environments in which technology serves as an invisible enabler, not a visible barrier. Then,
and to paraphrase Clay Shirky, ICT can
be ‘accessed when appropriate, and leveraged where required’.
Sam Morris
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80