48 CHROMATOGRAPHY
Fig. 3. compares the performance of a regular silica C18 column with the new chemically and mechanically stable phase presented in this work by cleaning them with NaOH. Te materials were washed in various concentrations of NaOH for 10 column volumes and the mobile phase eluent was collected. After that, silica content was analysed using ICP-AES. As shown in Fig. 3, the new phase withstands NaOH concentration 10 times higher than regular silica. Tis new class of material leaked 88ppm silica at 1M NaOH compared to 520ppm for the regular silica at 0.1M NaOH.
Te work shown here illustrates that this new class of chemically and mechanically stable columns can operate under a wide range of pH and be exposed to high concentrations of NaOH, facilitating the chromatographic work in the laboratory as well as in scale-up.
For more information ✔ at
www.scientistlive.com/eurolab
Fig. 2. Selectivity change on a 50 x 2.1mm EternityXT 2.5-C18 using 20 mM sodium phosphate at pH 2.1, 7.2 and 11.3. Conditions: mobile phase A 20 mM sodium phosphate, mobile phase B acetonitrile, gradient 0 - 0.5 min 10% B, 5.5 min 50% B, flow rate 1.5mL/min, detection UV @ 254nm.
n Angiotensin III Arg-Val-Tyr- Ile-His-Pro-Phe
Fig. 2. shows selectivity changes due to three distinct pH conditions. As seen in the figure, by using a sample mixture of neutral (fenuron), acidic (nitrobenzoic acid, pKA 3.7) and basic (procaine, pKA 9.0) compounds, the user can control retention time and achieve selectivity reversal with pH.
Basic drugs are in ionised form when the pH in the mobile phase is lower than the pKA, therefore basic compounds will exhibit low retention times at low pH in reversed phase chromatography. On the other hand, basic compounds are neutralised at two units higher
www.scientistlive.com
than the pKA, exhibiting longer retention times.
Medicinal chemists and scientists dealing with dirty samples – such as those with incomplete reactions or strongly retained impurities – find it challenging to maintain UHPLC and HPLC column performance when exposing them to harsh conditions.
Until now, chromatographic phases presented poor performance when exposed to caustic conditions.
However, by using the new organic/inorganic reinforced silica, it is possible to have columns that can resist tough conditions.
Fredrik Limé, Robert Fredriksson and Cecilia Mazza are with AkzoNobel, producer of the Kromasil range of products, in Sweden.
www.kromasil.com
“Until now, chromatographic phases presented poor performance when exposed to caustic conditions.”
Fig. 3. Comparison of regular C18 and mechanically/chemically stable C18 silica leakage when the stationary phase is exposed to cleaning in place (CIP) using a given NaOH solution/ethanol (50/50).
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92