This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
DRUG DISCOVERY AND DEVELOPMENT 37


The importance of tablet shape


Dale Natoli investigates the complexities of deciding on tablet shape.


W


hy that tablet shape? Tis is a question often asked, especially


when researching a solution to a tablet or tooling deficiency directly related to a tablet shape.


Most companies do their due diligence when selecting a tablet shape, and some simply only lack the understanding of the importance of tablet shape and its effect on efficiency.


An improper tablet shape can cost millions in lost production and sometimes even cause a complete disaster.


Some companies design unique tablets hoping to reach an acceptable level of consumer recognition with the objective to maintain customer loyalty; this effort is generally driven by marketing. Tablets are designed


Fig. 1. Powder extrusion in a flat face design.


considering the end user, such as a ‘break-easy’ bisect design or a child’s three-dimensional animal shaped multivitamin. Tablets are designed for technical application such as watch batteries and automotive airbag igniters, pre-formed desiccants, and so on.


However, some companies desire a tablet shape engineered to provide easy and unobstructed production such as a simple standard cup round.


Certain tablet shapes simply play havoc with tooling and press wear – adding significant costs to the unit dose. Te same is true with packaging, as an incorrect tablet design can chip, clog or provide an improper tablet count related to weight.


An error commonly made when considering a tablet shape is replicating and even duplicating a poor design. Unfortunately


this happens often within a company’s own product portfolio as well as in the attempt to replicate or duplicate an existing tablet that is considered to be a weak and deficient design.


One of those happens to be one of the oldest and most common tablet designs – and one that is still used today. Tis is the Flat Face Bevel Edge configuration, commonly referred to as the FFBE.


Te FFBE was designed as an alternative to the most common Flat Face design. At the onset of commercial tablet manufacturing, the industry sought out ways it could rectify a well-known issue with Flat Faced tablets, which was edge attrition. Te problem was created as the flat face tool entered into the compression cycle. Te FF design naturally pushed or forced the powder to the outside perimeter of the


www.scientistlive.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92