This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Repair welding with the process


parameters used for this study has no detrimental effects on tensile or fatigue properties of E357-T6 sand castings. Te study appears to support the principle that proper welding is appropriate for repairing or joining sand cast components to one another, though additional research is necessary for other alloys.


Tis article is based on a paper (13-1210) published in AFS Transactions 2013.


Fig. 7. Fatigue data for three types of weld repair specimens of E357-T6 sand castings shows the effect of the type of weld repair on fatigue life.


weld repair specimens was interden- dritic (Figure 10). Te smaller radii of curvature in these shapes gener- ally have a greater negative effect on fatigue life. As seen in Figures 11-12, the pores in the weld metal are smaller


and rounder compared to the larger interdendritic shrink porosity seen in the as-cast regions of the weld repaired specimens. Te available data does not explain the apparent increased fatigue life for the half-weld specimens.


Fig. 10. This micrograph shows the typical shape of porosity in E357-T6 sand castings.


Fig. 8. This micrograph shows the typical microstructure in E357-T6 cast (original) metal in weld repair specimens.


Fig. 9. The micrograph shows the typical microstructures of weld metal in E357-T6 weld repair specimens.


Table 2. Comparison of Tensile Test Statistics Showing Effect of Type of Weld Repair Specimen


Data Set No Weld Statistic Mean


Std. Dev High Low


Half Weld Mean


Std. Dev High Low


Full Weld Mean


Std. Dev High Low


Ultimate


Strength MPa 340.2


5.0


350.3 329.6 340.3 4.3


346.1 326.1 340.2 7.1


348.2 315.1


0.2% Yield Strength MPa


306.9 4.0


317.2 299.9 307.1 3.7


313.0 299.2 308.4 3.3


313.7 302.0


Elongation %


1.94 0.62 3.62 1.16 2.00 0.52 3.47 0.98 1.92 0.55 2.94 0.69


Fig. 11. This micrograph shows the compar- ison of pore size and shape in weld metal and cast metal in partial weld specimen.


Fig. 12. This micrograph shows a compari- son of pore size and shape in weld metal and cast metal in the full-weld specimen.


December 2013 MODERN CASTING | 45


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68