This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Old Probl Opportu


Pulverizing juniper into feed supplement might prove useful to landowners By Heather Smith Thomas


A


scientist in the sheep and goat country around San Angelo is researching a new use for an old problem — and might have an-


other income stream for ranchers and landowners. Dr. Travis Whitney, Texas A&M AgriLife Re-


search, has found that abundant — most of us say invasive — juniper can be converted into low-cost livestock feed. In his “Wood to Feed” project Whitney started


looking at feeding juniper leaves to sheep and goats as a nutritional roughage source. He has expanded his study to feeding the entire tree. Whitney arrived in San Angelo in 2005 to re-


search sheep and goat nutrition. He looked through literature and studies done by his predecessors and found that up to a third of a goat’s diet can be fresh juniper leaves, especially during winter. “I wondered if it could be economically viable for ranchers to cut down trees, let the trees dry, shake the trees and use the leaves,” he says.


Juniper versus cottonseed hull nutrition “The leaves themselves are about 65 percent digested, which is very close to alfalfa. The leaves


are between 6 and 7.5 percent protein,” says Whit- ney. The neutral detergent fi ber in mature red- berry juniper trees (the whole ground-up tree) is about 66 percent and acid detergent fi ber about 56 percent. Neutral detergent fi ber is an indicator of intake, and acid detergent fi ber is correlated to digestibility,” he explains. Compare this to cottonseed hulls, which are


about 21 to 28 percent digested with 5 to 6.5 per- cent crude protein, 80 percent neutral detergent fi ber and 70 percent acid detergent fi ber. However, labor costs of getting the leaves off


the trees more than offset the advantages. “It’s like getting the needles from a dry Christmas tree. It’s a lot of work for very little pay.” He started grinding limbs less than 2 inches in


diameter with the leaves to make a good rough- age source. The material was chipped, blown into a peanut-drying trailer and dried for about 4 hours. “It goes from about 60 percent dry mat- ter to about 92 percent dry matter. We put that dried material into a hammermill to reduce it to small particles, putting it through a 4.75 millime- ter screen (nearly 3/16 inch) to make a nice feed


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126