This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
CATTLE RAISERS COMMUNITY


INDUSTRY ALLIED


Cargill Idles Plainview Beef Processing Plant Affected Employees to Receive Support


C


ARGILL IDLED ITS PLAINVIEW BEEF PROCESSING FACILITY effective at the close of business Feb.1, due pri- marily to the tight cattle supply brought about by


years of drought in Texas and Southern Plains states. Approximately 2,000 people worked at the Plainview facility, and they received company support. “The decision to idle our Plainview beef processing


plant was a diffi cult and painful one to make and was made only after we conducted an exhaustive analysis of the regional cattle supply and processing capacity situation in North America,” said John Keating, presi- dent of Cargill Beef, based in Wichita, Kan. “While idling a major beef plant is unfortunate


because of the resulting layoff of good people, which impacts their families and the community of Plainview, we were compelled to make a decision that would reduce the strain created on our beef business by the reduced cattle supply,” Keating said. “The U.S. cattle herd is at its lowest level since 1952. Increased feed costs resulting from the prolonged drought, combined with herd liquidations by cattle ranchers, are severely and adversely contributing to the challenging business conditions we face as an industry. Our preference would have been not to idle a plant.” The company’s remaining beef cattle processing


plants in the region, at Friona, Dodge City, Kan., and Fort Morgan, Colo., will receive cattle that were previ- ously destined for processing at Plainview. The com- pany’s regional beef facilities at Fresno, Calif., Mil- waukee, Wis., and Wyalusing, Pa., as well as its beef plant in Schuyler, Neb., and 2 beef plants in Canada, are unaffected. “Given the over-capacity that exists with 4 major


beef plants in the Texas Panhandle and a dwindling supply of cattle in the region, idling Plainview will allow Cargill to operate its other beef plants in Texas, Colorado and Kansas more consistently on a 5-day- per-week basis to meet our customers’ requirements, while helping us maintain our position in the U.S. beef sector,” explained Keating. The plan to idle Cargill’s Plainview facility includes


measures for preserving its infrastructure for potential reopening if the U.S. cattle herd rebounds and requires additional processing capacity. However, Cargill does not expect the U.S. cattle herd to signifi cantly increase


18 The Cattleman March 2013


Brad Barnes, left, president and general manager of the Fort Worth Stock Show and Rodeo, and TSCRA President Joe Parker Jr., Byers, welcomed TSCRA members to the fi rst ranch gathering of 2013, part of the Fort Worth Stock Show and Rodeo. The Ranching Heritage Celebration dinner was held Saturday, Jan. 19, just before the FWSS Ranch Rodeo.


thecattlemanmagazine.com


in size for a number of years. “We delayed the decision to idle Plainview as long


as possible, due in part to our outstanding team and ongoing excellent support from the community. We were also hoping the drought would break, pasturelands would be restored, cattle ranchers would retain heifers and the national herd trend of declining numbers over the past few years would be reversed,” stated Keating. “Unfortunately, the drought has not broken, feed


costs remain higher than historical averages and the herd continues to shrink. The industry has experienced this cycle in the past, although this one is longer and more severe than most. Nevertheless, we are optimis- tic about the long-term prospects for U.S. beef demand from American and international consumers, and that the drought in Texas and the Southern Plains will be- come a memory.”


TSCRA NEWS


TSCRA Celebrates Ranching Heritage at Fort Worth Stock Show and Rodeo


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126