JANUARY 2013
Legal Focus
in the Tribunal that a particular disclosure was not made in the public interest. Employees will continue to settle cases rather than litigate.
Courts have generally interpreted the whistle blowing legislation widely and adopted a purposive construction. It will
therefore take a brave employer to argue in the Tribunal that a particular disclosure was not made in the public interest.
How necessary do you think the reforms were? are there any further changes you would have liked to see?
It was felt the reforms were necessary to stem the rise in whistle blowing claims within the finance and banking industries. Bankers were using the loophole as a litigation tactic in bonus and pay disputes. However, whilst an additional criteria of public interest has been introduced to make some claims difficult, there are no changes to the protection and remedies available to the whistle blower who has successfully (and rightly) blown the whistle. In the UK, whistle blowers are protected against detriment and dismissal. However, the question arises as to whether we need to follow the US model, where, in certain cases, whistle blowers are financially rewarded by regulators for their acts. This would encourage more whistle blowing.
according to information released by the corporate investigation group Kroll, between June 2011 and May 2012 the FSa received 3,733 reports of whistle-blowing through its helpline, a significant increase of 189% compared to the same period three years ago. to what do you attribute this rise?
There is certainly increased awareness of whistle blowing, which has encouraged employees to come forward. Due to the economic climate, there has been a great deal of job insecurity within the finance industry and employees have engaged in litigation tactics using the whistle blowing legislation to maximise their bargaining power in disputes with employers. Despite the reforms, I feel the claims will continue to increase as employees and their lawyers become more imaginative.
Is there anything else you would like to add?
Employers should be reviewing their staff handbooks and whistle blowing policies. In addition, I think there is a need to train HR Departments in, firstly, recognising a potential whistle blowing claim and, secondly, taking positive steps to deal with such complaints. LM
contact details:
85
Raj dhokia
FREEdMan GREEn dHoKIa SoLIcItoRS 105 Boundary Road, London nW8 0RG tel: 020 7625 6003 Fax: 020 7372 3861
Email:
r.dhokia@fgdlaw.co.uk
www.lawyer-monthly.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112