52
Legal Focus
JANUARY 2013
The Changing Landscape of competition Law
Continuing our Legal Focus on the Changing Landscape of Competition Law, Lawyer Monthly speaks to Anthony Maton, Managing Partner of Hausfeld & Co LLP, a leading, claimant-focused litigation practice based in the City of London.
Please introduce yourself, your role and your firm.
Hausfeld & Co LLP specialises in Competition / Antitrust, Financial Services, Consumer and Human Rights law, very often with an international dimension. We currently act for hundreds of business claimants and individuals located throughout Europe and around the world who have incurred financial losses in relation to cartels operating across a range of industries. Many of these are not on the public record but of those that are they include the state railway companies of Germany, Italy & Holland; the Libyan State Oil industry; Emerson & Samsung; Travis Perkins plc; JLR, Volvo, IKEA & H&M. Hausfeld & Co adopts a business oriented, commercial and practical approach to litigation and we aim to achieve resolution of disputes on sensible terms as soon as this can effectively be reached.
As Managing Partner of Hausfeld & Co LLP, I specialise in competition and financial services litigation. I have extensive experience in complex international dispute resolution including litigation, arbitration, and mediation in a number of different jurisdictions. I have acted for governments, in regulatory investigations, for multinationals and for private business, and have worked in the U.S. and extensively throughout Europe, the Middle East, and the Gulf. My recent experience in the competition field includes acting in the air passenger settlement against BA/ Virgin, acting against BA in the London arm of the global air cargo cartel litigation being handled by Hausfeld, developing the Cartel Key funding methodology for cartel claims in the London Court, acting on the Parker Settlement in the Marine Hose cartel, and being lead counsel on High Court claims with respect to the Paraffin Wax, Marine Hose, Car Glass, Carbon Graphite, and Methionine claims.
www.lawyer-monthly.com
In preparation for wider reforms set to be made to the UK competition law regime, the office of Fair trading recently published revised rules setting out its new decision-making processes, attempting to speed up the enforcement of antitrust rules and increase engagement with the parties involved. What are the main points of these revisions?
At the outset, it should be said that we welcome legislative reform which strengthens and enhances competition law enforcement, and promotes competition in markets for the long-term benefit of consumers and small medium enterprises (“SME”) to which these reforms are primarily targeted.
The updated guidance on the Competition Act 1998 procedures follows a consultation process launched in March 2012. It updates the OFT's guidance originally published in March 2011, with some extra revisions, which include;
• Collective decision making, with final decisions to be made by a tribunal decision panel of 3. Currently, decisions are made by the same person handling the investigation.
• In those cases where the OFT is considering finding an infringement and imposing a financial penalty, parties involved will be able to make representations on key elements of the OFT’s proposed penalty calculation.
• Increased interactive oral hearings and “state of play” meetings.
• The OFT will also be publishing case opening notices and case-specific administrative timetables on its website.
In addition to the above changes, the OFT has also extended the trial of its procedural adjudicator role until its powers have been transferred to the Competitions and Market Authority which will replace the OFT in 2014 in
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112