44
Legal Focus
JANUARY 2013
Enforcing a foreign judgement chile
Proceedings leading up to court cases are complicated and come with a plethora of legal complexities. However, the challenges do not simply stop once a ruling has been reached. Enforcing judgements can be just as tricky, especially within cross-border cases, as the recent case regarding Chevron and the people of Ecuador highlights. To find out more, Lawyer Monthly speaks to Francisco González, partner and head of the litigation department at Barros Letelier & González.
Please introduce yourself and your firm and tell me about the cases you normally work on.
Barros Letelier & González provides full legal services, including litigation before ordinary and arbitral tribunals. Given the increasing presence of foreign investment in Chile, many cases we take to court have complex international aspects to consider, especially issues regarding the enforcement of judicial rulings. Besides, senior partner Dr. Enrique Barros is a much respected arbitrator and has issued important decisions involving foreign companies. Because of his influential academic work he is also often asked to prepare expert reports in trials of crucial importance, which include matters of international private law and enforcement of foreign sentences.
can you describe the enforcement proceeding in chile?
The recognition of foreign judgements in civil matters is governed by the Code of Civil Procedure, international treaties and the Civil Code. The law requires an “exequatur” issued by the Supreme Court in order to recognize the legal effect of the foreign ruling:
• The interested party must file a request before the Supreme Court presenting an authorized copy of the judgement.
• Once the exequatur is granted, the foreign sentence has the same force as a Chilean judgement and can be enforced by the same tribunal competent to enforce Chilean judgements on the same matter.
www.lawyer-monthly.com
Which are the legal criteria to grant or deny the exequatur?
First, the Court must apply the rules established in international treaties, mainly the Code of International Private Law, the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (New York Convention) and the 1975 Inter-American Convention on International Commercial Arbitration (Panama Convention).
In case the judgement is not covered by a treaty, the principle of international reciprocity applies. Thus the foreign judgement shall have the same force recognized by the foreign courts to a Chilean judgement.
In case none of the previous rules are applicable, the foreign judgement must meet the following requirements: (i) No contravention of Chilean law or jurisdiction i.e. it shall not oppose Chilean ordre public, (ii) duly service of process of the party against which the judgement will be enforced, (iii) all legal recourses must be exhausted according to the law of the country of origin.
Is it difficult to enforce a foreign arbitral judgement?
Most issues we encounter regarding foreign decisions arise from arbitral tribunals. In the past years, Chile has adjusted its legislation to international standards:
• For the enforcement of foreign arbitral judgements the Code of Civil Procedure requires a “double exequatur”, i.e. a
tel: +56 2 4312700 Fax: +56 2 4312701 Email:
fgonzalez@blg.cl Website:
www.blg.cl
certification of the authenticity and legal effectiveness of the judgement in form of an approval by a superior court of the country of origin.
• In 2004 this system was replaced by Law 19.971 (chapter VIII) which abolishes the “double exequatur”, adopting the criteria of the New York Convention. It establishes a presumption of validity of the foreign arbitral judgements, unless it is successfully challenged before the Chilean Supreme Court. Its recent decisions have clarified that a pending remedy in the country of origin does not automatically bar the enforcement (KfW v. Inverraz), but if nullity was declared by a Court of the country of origin, enforcement is not longer possible (EDFI v. Endesa and YPF). LM
contact details:
Francisco González Barros, Letelier & González
av. Isidora Goyenechea 3120, 3rd floor, Santiago, chile
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112