This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
RETROFIT BUSINESS


The Retrofi t Roofi ng Game: Preparing for the Existing Roof Analysis


By Mark James


This month, I want to address the steps to prepare for a design analysis of an existing roof, which is necessary to determine if an existing roof can support the new roof system. The analysis is a three-step process. First, determine specifi cally what makes up the existing roof and what it is supporting. Second, identify what the new system weights are and the new imposing design loads. And, third is the analysis, which itself is quite simple but vital to determining if the existing roof will in fact support the new retrofi t system.


8 METAL CONSTRUCTION NEWS July 2012 There are several factors affecting the design analysis:


• Building code roof loading criteria changes since the building was fi rst constructed, which include snow and wind, as well as importance and exposure factors.


• The added weight of the new retrofi t system and how it is transferred to the existing roof structure.


• The proposed new roof geometry and how it will affect snow loads due to valleys, hips or ridges and large roof penetrations (chimneys, etc.).


• Relocation of existing rooftop equipment either repositioning on the existing roof or elevating to the new roof.


All of these changes are the reason why exist-


ing roof systems and their structural components must be analyzed to confi rm their capability to sup- port the new and existing loads. Flat roofs are considered to be uniform load-


ing systems; retrofi t systems are point- loaded systems. The difference between these two is you have a new roof that will deliver a series of con- centrated loads into the existing roof structure. As stated before, roofs utilize a structural grid, whether constructed of steel, wood or concrete. This grid combines primary and secondary load-bearing as- semblies that receive positive acting (downward) loads and ultimately transfer them to the build- ing foundation through load-bearing walls and/or structural columns. For example: A pre-engineered metal building has rigid frames (primary structural el- ements) that are normally spaced from 20 to 30 feet on-center, making up a bay. The rigid frames receive the design roof loads (snow, dead and collateral) from the roof panel and purlins (secondary structural elements). From these, the loads are transferred to the columns into the building foundation. The primary assembly comprises load-bearing


walls (including those at the exterior perimeter of the building, girders and trusses (steel or wood) and beams (steel, concrete or wood). The sec- ondary assemblies can be open-web steel bar joists, purlins (steel or wood) and concrete beams, including tees used in pre-cast roof systems. Most secondary assemblies distribute uniform loads to their outer ends where its total tributary load is distributed to the primary supporting assembly. Tributary loads are the positive acting roof


design load measured across the member to a distance equal to one half of its spacing to each adjacent secondary member multiplied by the member’s span. For example: If a bar joist in an ex- isting roof is spaced at 5 feet on-center and spans


50 feet, then the tributary is 2 1/2 feet outward from its centerline in each direction multiplied by 50 feet, or 250 square feet. Now, if the roof’s total design load is 28 pounds per square foot, then the total load carried by the joist is 250 by 28, or 7,000 pounds. Therefore, each joist will distribute half of this load, or 3,500 pounds, to each of its ends onto its primary support beam or wall. For a designer to perform an analysis, it is fi rst


necessary to collect information on the compo- nents that make up the existing roof assembly. These will include:


• The existing waterproofi ng membrane if it is to remain


• The roof insulation • The structural decking • Any suspended loads, such as ceilings and HVAC or electrical equipment.


• Fire sprinkler systems, which could have been added since the building was originally built


McElroy Metal Inc., Bossier City, La., has a


“Retrofi t Designer’s Guide” available at www. mcelroymetal.com. The guide lists common building material and assembly weights and pro- vides a listing of open-web bar joists with their physical dimensions. This valuable tool helps identify the specifi c joist types in a building roof. Once identifi ed, you need to determine the load carrying capacity of the existing. To do this, use old load tables or obtain a recent edition of “80 Years of Open Web Steel Joist Construction,” published by the Steel Joist Institute at www. steeljoist.org. For wood and concrete, most designers can determine the load capacities through calculations. Now, you can see what information has to be


collected in order to determine if the existing roof can indeed support the new retrofi t roof system. The information is necessary to perform the analy- sis. If the existing roof cannot support the new retro- fi t roof, then remedial work and strengthening of the existing roof system will be required. This is why it is highly suggested to perform the analysis prior to fi nalizing any monetary costs on the project.


Mark James has more than 40 years experience in the retrofi t and metal construction markets, work- ing for leading manufacturers and executing great projects. Currently, he is president of RetroSpec LLC, a consulting company offering direction and deep knowledge of the retrofi t business for manu- facturers and contractors. James can be reached at mark@retrospecllc.com.


www.metalconst ruct ionnews.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68