This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
of the best title games ever, didn’t come out of nowhere like Delaware did in ‘07. (The Blue Hens were 6-5 in April and in serious danger of missing their conference tournament before embarking on a seven-game winning streak.) But Navy made its first appearance in the NCAA championship game in 29 years — and hasn’t been to a final four since. That team had a host of scorers led by senior Joe Bossi, the second-ranked faceoff man in the nation in junior Chris Pieczonka and the hottest goalie in Division I in sophomore Matt Russell. The same mix of ingredients applied to Denver last year, when head coach Bill Tierney led the Pioneers to their first-ever final four by engineering a 14-9 takedown of No. 3-seeded Johns Hopkins in the NCAA quarterfinals. The Pioneers, with faceoff ace Chase Carraro, freshman goalie Jamie Faus and an array of finishers led by attackmen Mark Matthews and Alex Demopoulos, caught Hopkins with its striking speed in the first meeting ever between the two schools.


Jake Deane, Jack Reid and Sean Morris (UMass 2006)


“Even though we were 14-2 going into the tournament, we were still kind of under the radar. For one, we’re 2,000 miles from the game’s epicenter,” said Tierney, who thinks Denver exploited its unfamiliarity against the Blue Jays. “We had so many first-time events last year — first ECAC tournament, first NCAA tournament game [a 13-10 win over Villanova] at home. We got used to doing things we weren’t used to, and [Hopkins] had never played us.” “I knew we were in trouble going out there,” recalled Johns Hopkins head coach Dave Pietramala, whose Blue Jays had crushed Hofstra — a familiar opponent — in what had been billed as a precarious NCAA tournament first- round game. “So many people were telling my guys to just get past Hofstra, and then you get to beat Denver.” In some of the recent Cinderella surprises, an incredible event on par with Delaware’s Shot Heard Round the Lacrosse World has transpired. In 2006, it was UMass staging an amazing comeback in the quarterfinals against third-seeded Hofstra. Down by


FORMULA FOR


Cinderella


Towson in 2001, Navy in 2004, Massachusetts in 2006, Delaware in 2007, Notre Dame in 2010 and Denver in 2011 all made unlikely runs to the NCAA final four. Here are five key ingredients these thrill- catchers shared.


scoring opportunities, but allow you to control tempo and disrupt a better opponent’s rhythm. Examples: Justin Berry (Towson), Chris Pieczonka (Navy), Jake Deane (UMass), Alex Smith (Delaware) and Chase Carraro (Denver).


1 2


3


Scott Rodgers (Notre Dame 2010)


4 5


A Publication of US Lacrosse Great Goalkeeping Confidence that your goalie


will make all the saves he should and a few he should not will allow your defense to extend and create transition. Examples: Matt Russell (Navy), Doc Schneider (UMass), Tommy Scherr (Delaware), Scott Rodgers (Notre Dame) and Jamie Faus (Denver).


Hot Shooters


It helps to have a resident Canadian, but homegrown


snipers work just as well if they hit their stride at the right time. Examples: Kyle Campbell (Towson), Sean Morris (UMass), Curtis Dickson (Delaware), Zach Brenneman (Notre Dame) and Jeremy Noble (Denver).


Senior Leadership Chemistry, hunger and


a sense of urgency after playing four years together make for great Cinderella stuff. Examples: Navy, UMass, Delaware and Notre Dame.


Momentum


Gotta have a turf troll. Possessions not only lead to


Faceoff Ace


Must-win games either in your conference tournament


or at the end of the regular season propel you into the NCAA tournament with an appreciation for preparedness. Examples: Towson, Navy, Delaware and Denver.


May 2012 >> LACROSSE MAGAZINE 57


©JOHN STROHSACKER (ALL)


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84