This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
MACAU BUSINESS


here since the Japanese businessman is not a direct shareholder of Wynn Macau, said Mr Neves.


Ripple effect


While authorities in Macau sit and watch, deciding whether or not actions need to be taken, financial advisors expect investigations to be carried out by the Nevada Gaming Commission “into what transpired between the two parties, and a ruling on how the matter is going to be decided,” says Yale Bock, president of Y H & C Investments, a registered investment advisor based in Las Vegas. He says the “Securities and Exchange Commission and U.S. Department of Justice will probably investigate the details of the dispute, including all allegations of bribery.” In regards to Macau, “one can only imagine how


government officials in China view the public airing of dirty laundry, but certainly it cannot be considered a good thing for Wynn Resorts,” Mr Bock says. For his part, Mr Okada says he will “vigorously” pursue his casino project in the Philippines.


Spotlight on varsity donation


W


ynn Resorts Ltd. announced recently that the United States Securities and Exchange


Commission (SEC) is launching an informal inquiry over its subsidiary Wynn Macau Ltd.’s MOP1.1 billion (US$135 million) donation to the University of Macau. Wynn Resorts said in a regulatory filing that it had received a letter from the SEC requesting “the company preserve information relating to the donation to the University of Macau, any donations by the


company to any other educational charitable institutions, including the University of Macau Development Foundation, and the company’s casino or concession gaming licenses or renewals in Macau.” Wynn Resorts said it would comply fully. The gaming operator said the letter


follows the lawsuit filed against the company by Kazuo Okada. Mr Okada in January filed a lawsuit against Wynn Resorts alleging he was blocked from seeing the company’s financial records after he objected to the donation to the University of Macau. This was the incident that appears to have triggered the feud between both parties that


“I intend to vigorously continue my US$2-billion


[MOP16 billion] investment” in Entertainment City Manila, Mr Okada said in a statement read to Philippines legislators and quoted by Bloomberg. “Rest assured that I will be able to prove that all of the accusations are baseless and are lies that have been blown out of proportion.” Philippine President Benigno Aquino ordered an inquiry into allegations that the Pagcor chairman Mr Naguiat accepted illegal gifts from Mr Okada. Mr Naguiat has said he will not quit, as has been requested by some. He has denied any wrongdoing but confirmed staying at Wynn Macau and Las Vegas. He said it was a standard industry courtesy and


reciprocity. Other than complimentary accommodation, no gifts in cash or in kind were received by Pagcor officials during his tenure, Mr Naguiat added.


Philippine politicians want to ban Mr Wynn from doing business in the country, saying his allegations of bribe taking by the country’s gaming regulator have denigrated the country’s image.


saw Wynn Resorts forcibly buy out Mr Okada’s 19.7-percent stake in the U.S.-based gaming operator. In May last year, Wynn Macau made a commitment to the University of Macau Development Foundation consisting of a US$25 million payment and promises of additional donations of US$10 million a year from this year through to 2022. Wynn Resorts is the second U.S.-based


casino operator to face an SEC probe into its Macau operations. Las Vegas Sands Corp. said last year it faced an inquiry into compliance with US anti-bribery laws. Details of that case have been few and far between.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100