Poncing along the towpath FOOTWEAR FOCUS ROAD TEST
moving back to live in London. On Dartmoor I have a gate from my garden that takes me onto the Moor.
S
In London if I don’t want to pound the pavements (and I don’t, my knees would rebel) I have to catch a bus or take the car to somewhere I can run. That’s not strictly true. I always walk for ten minutes before I run to prepare my body for the impending trauma. I am lucky enough to live near the Thames, ten minutes walk, from what is quaintly called the “tow path.” To me a towpath runs alongside a canal and it conjures pictures in my
mind of beautiful dray horses quietly towing barges through the countryside. Any honest dray horse would probably bolt if they saw the sights and sounds on the bank of London’s river. I have always thought it was better for humanity and for my own self-esteem that I ran as far away from other people as possible. Fortunately Footwear Today likes to publish pictures of shoes, not its reviewers. My gait and garb would certainly frighten the horses. When I was last living in London (a long time ago) I ran and I had running
gear including Lycra running tights. But it was fairly unusual then. I recall the looks and remarks I used to get (being called “Ducky” by burley builders, for example). That may have intimidated someone less thick skinned than I am: it was definitely considered effeminate or kinky to wear tights in those days. Today there is a Lycra epidemic, an explosion. If you go down to the river
on a Sunday morning almost everyone is tightly clad in a second skin of sporty Lycra. And of course there are the cyclists on the towpath too for whom it has always been de rigueur. I think dressing in the most appropriate kit is quite right whatever activity
you are involved in – which is why road testing shoes like the UK Gear PT- 1000 is so interesting. And having been the victim of catcalls in the past I am the last one to criticise people for dressing properly, however odd we look. In fact its great that people who, perhaps justifiably, have a body self image that is worse than mine pull their fingers out, dress up, put on their running shoes and get some exercise. But like the alien arriving on this planet I have to admit to having seen some strange sights! The strangest perhaps is the men who protect their modesty by wearing conventional shorts over their running tights – they look a bit like Superman who was distracted by the phone ringing when he was changing in the phone booth ! Fortunately for me my UK Gear PT-1000 SC are a good, conventionally looking trail running shoe. In fact with their understated charcoal, chilli pepper and silver livery they were quite butch – something to offset the Lycra! Butch is something you would associate with a company that worked with the British Army Physical Training Corps to design shoes for soldiers. Most of us reluctantly don our running shoes, at best, two or three times a week for a potter in the park and tell friends down the pub of an evening, “I went for a run this morning.” (Come on be honest!). It is part of a soldier’s job description to be fit. If the kit they use is too
conventional it will not be robust enough to last – I used to live near the Royal Marine Commando training base and a shop nearby did a roaring trade in boots and rucksacks because the kit with which the Marines were issued was simply not up to the job – which is a poor reflection of how governments treat our soldiers – but that is another story.
16 • FOOTWEAR TODAY • JUNE/JULY 2011
ome of you who have read my reviews before will know that I normally run on Dartmoor dodging the hazards of rocks, streams and bogs. If you have everimagined what it would be like for an alien landing on earth, you will come close to the experience I have had
Henry Harington dons lycra to test UK Gear ‘s PT-1000 a “1,000 mile road & trail running shoe.”
I have previously tested the UK Gear’s PT-03 shoes – one designed for
winter running and the other for the desert. They have designed this shoe for the guys who have to train on road and trail. They call the shoe the PT- 1000 SC – SC stands for Structured Cushioning (SC), which they say makes it supportive and long lasting with an excellent level of cushioning. It is well suited for runners with an average running gait and mild to moderate stability needs. But perhaps more importantly being a road and trail shoe it suits the demands of running on roads to get to the trails. This is the position I find myself in now running from the house to the Thames towpath and it makes the PT-1000 an ideal hybrid shoe for this “cross-training.” As I mentioned my knees rebel if I pound pavements but these shoes provide the best of both worlds – road and trail. The soles of the shoes boast being constructed from Dureva, a proprietary midsole material built on a unique molecular structure. It is found exclusively in UK Gear footwear and, they claim, provides unmatched sustained cushioning and support thereby dramatically extending the lifespan of the shoe. They add that in using Dureva to determine midsole density, shock
absorption and stability they optimise the
performance and durability of the shoes. You might have guessed it from the name but UK Gear say the PT-1000 is
a “1,000 mile road & trail running shoe.” (It wouldn’t sound the same if they claimed it was a 1,609.344 kilometre road & trail running shoe.) Well, 1000 miles (or 1,609.344 kilometres) that you or I run, poncing about in the park in our Lycra, is a very different and punishing 1,000 miles that the same shoes will endure on the feet of a fit soldier getting fitter to run for his life when he is posted to serve in Afghanistan.
PT-1000's RRP: £95. UK Gear Ltd,
Tel: 0870 4031400 e:
info@ukgear.com www.ukgear.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126 |
Page 127 |
Page 128 |
Page 129 |
Page 130 |
Page 131 |
Page 132 |
Page 133 |
Page 134 |
Page 135 |
Page 136 |
Page 137 |
Page 138 |
Page 139 |
Page 140 |
Page 141 |
Page 142 |
Page 143 |
Page 144 |
Page 145 |
Page 146 |
Page 147 |
Page 148 |
Page 149 |
Page 150 |
Page 151 |
Page 152 |
Page 153 |
Page 154 |
Page 155 |
Page 156 |
Page 157 |
Page 158 |
Page 159 |
Page 160