TOP 100 DEVELOPERS Critic’s choice
WHO ARE the best games studios in the world? Who makes the best games? Who deserves the kudos? That last question is one we have tried to answer with every annual version of the Develop 100. Whether based on the now-narrower retail sales data or our confident judgement, the previous six editions have highlighted star performers in global games development. Nintendo. Ubisoft Montreal.
Traveller’s Tales. EA Canada. Infinity Ward. Big studios, both in-house and independent, have formed the bulk of our listings. But in an evolving market, where
microstudios and bedroom coders are seeing a renaissance, a more universal metric is needed. This year we are using Metacritic data as the backbone for the Develop 100. That means, for the first time, digital content plays a major part in this list, as do mobile games.
TIMES-A-CHANGING
Half the list comprises of studios that have built a reputation for themselves and their brands through Apple’s iPhone/iPad App Store and its rivals – the rest are studios using retail releases or console-based digital distribution to grow or establish themselves.
It’s also the most geographically mixed listing we’ve ever published. 19 countries are represented from core games markets like USA, Japan, Canada and the UK to emerging markets with teams from India, Slovakia, Spain, Czech Republic and Russia. Plus, we’ve only taken 2010 releases into account, this is not a historical ranking. So while the top developers of all time according to Metacritic include Blizzard, Nintendo, Valve and BioWare, not all of them feature in the Develop 100. That last point exemplifies one of the wider trends in the industry that this more progressive Develop 100 speaks to. Big studios missing from the ranking this year include BioWare and Ubisoft Montreal, two of the most respected publisher- owned superstudios responsible for
www.mcvuk.com two
big 2010 games –
Mass Effect 2 and Assassin’s Creed: Brotherhood. Unfortunately, they are also between them responsible for some sub- standard DLC, and some
averagely-received licensed games. An aggregate system taking the average across the review scores for all those releases pushes them down the ranking.
That will be sad news for the hundreds of staff at those studios and their similar-sized contemporary. In the age of the iPhone developer, the message couldn’t be clearer: the move to smaller and one-man teams has redressed the balance. Large monolithic structures are great for job security and commercial reward, but credit is shared for good or ill. You can’t hide in big faceless publisher-owned studios if you want glory. The good or bad work of your colleagues – whether they are sat next to you, on another floor, or in another state all working for the same development studio ‘brand’ – will have as much impact on the credit you can claim as your own will.
MOBILE MARKET
Do note that it’s not just a handful of larger studios that will have been victim of the simple if brutal aggregation of stats – other big commercial players with smaller team stature, such as Angry Birds creator Rovio Mobile, are missing from the list due to their review averages falling out of our top 100. And that pinpoints the second major gaming trend that the Develop 100
“
Michael French examines the trends highlighted by this year’s Develop 100
reflects – the rise of mobile gaming and the
resultant fundamental widening of the market.
The Develop 100 proves that good ideas are
rewarded with critical kudos.
Metacritic didn’t add reviews of iOS products until March, but its data and results track back to releases over the last few years. The inclusion of this data with the ‘traditional’ console world here in the Develop 100makes for sobering reading. While iPhone reviews are still a nascent field in the criticism of games – the Touch Arcades and Pocket Gamers of the world are far younger and less established than the IGNs and GameSpots – but they are no less relevant.
Almost all the digital download games in our 100 ranking are original properties, not the over- exposed franchises we’ve seen over and over. That’s not to say well- established game series are missing from the list, but more often than not big brands and licences mean quick commercial rewards and less critical success. Here, the Develop 100proves that good ideas are rewarded with critical kudos. Ultimately, this industry is changing quicker than ever – and the Develop 100reflects that. Turn the page for a summary of the Develop 100. The book is free with certain editions of MCV and the June issue of Develop. Head to
develop100.com for more in-depth analysis.
June 3rd 2011 51
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96