66
nanotimes News in Brief
Mass Production // Top-down Unmanufacturability
I
n a paper published in Nanotechnology, Professor Mike Kelly, Centre for Advanced Photonics and
Electronics, University of Cambridge, U.K., sta- ted that you cannot mass produce structures with a diameter of three nanometres or less using a top-down approach. This statement raises a major question concerning the billions of dollars that are poured into nanotechnology each year in the hope that the latest technology developed in the lab can make the transition to a manufactured product on the market.
The overall goal when entering nanotechnologies into the market is low-cost, high-volume manufac- turability, but at the same time, the materials’ pro- perties must be highly reproducible within a pre-spe- cified limit, which Kelly states cannot happen below the 3nm limit when trying to make arrays. The top- down approach to manufacturing, which Kelly states is limited, uses external tools to cut and shape large materials to contain many smaller features. Its alter- native, the bottom-up approach, involves piecing together small units, usually molecules, to construct whole materials – much like a jigsaw puzzle – howe- ver this process is too unpredictable for defect – free mass production of arrays.
Kelly used statistical evaluation of vertical nano- pillars – that have been suggested for uses in sensors and displays – as an example to demonstrate his theory. He states that the proof comes in two stages.
The first is due to the fact that when materials are mass produced on such a small scale there will be a lot of variation in the size of different components.
As a result of this variation, the properties of the material will vary to an extent where the material cannot function to full capacity within an array.
Professor Kelly says, “If I am wrong, and a counterex- ample to my theorem is provided, many scientists would be more secure in their continued working, and that is good for science. “If more work is de- voted to the hard problem of understanding just what can be manufactured and how, at the expense of more studies of things that cannot be manufac- tured under the conditions of the present theorem, then that too is good for science and for technology.”
M. J. Kelly: Intrinsic top-down unmanufacturability, In: Nanotechnology, Volume 22(2011), Number 24, Article 245303, DOI:10.1088/0957-4484/22/24/245303:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/22/24/245303
Abstract: “(...). We show that structures with 3 nm design rules can be fabricated but not manufactured in a top-down ap- proach – they do not have the reproducibility to give a satisfactory yield to a pre-ordained specification. It is also shown that the transition from manufacturability to intrin- sic unmanufacturability takes place at nearer 7nm design rules.” © IOP
11-04 :: April/May 2011
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93