This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
JURISDICTION REPORT: TURKEY


SIMPLIFIED DESTRUCTION PROCEEDINGS IN TURKEY


Isik Ozdogan and Ezgi Baklaci Moroglu Arseven Law Firm


Te New Customs Regulation, which came into effect in October 2009, provides a new mechanism for intellectual property right holders, known as ‘simplified destruction’. Tis enables owners to take more efficient action in cases of an infringement during customs proceedings. Until 2009, there was no legal arrangement for the simplified destruction of goods at customs. Te New Customs Regulation was accepted to harmonise Turkish customs law with EU legislation. For this reason, the simplified destruction provisions are highly similar to EU Council Regulation No.1383/2003.


Te simplified destruction mechanism enables intellectual property rights holders to request the destruction of the suspected infringing or counterfeit products that have been detained or suspended under control of customs, without a court order. Within 10 working days following the suspension of the suspected goods at customs (three working days if the goods are perishable), trademark, patent, design, utility model, copyright, copyright- related rights, integrated circuit topography rights or plant variety rights holders may contact the customs authority and request the destruction of the goods within the scope of the simplified destruction mechanism. Te period of 10 working days can be extended by a further 10 working days in case of an acceptable excuse.


When requesting the destruction of the suspended goods in the scope of the simplified destruction mechanism, intellectual property rights holders should submit a declaration explaining that the suspended goods are counterfeit or pirated, how the suspended goods infringe, and the true owner’s written consent. Te owner of the suspended goods should consent (in writing) to the destruction of the suspended goods under customs control. Upon receipt of the simplified destruction request and the written consent of the suspended goods’ owner, the customs authority decides to destroy the suspended goods and constitutes a ‘destruction board’. Te destruction is carried out by licensed waste facility under the supervision of the rights holder.


Te simplified destruction mechanism is a rapid and cost-effective method for rights owners, since it does not require a court order for the destruction. Also, the suspended goods’ owners usually prefer this method rather than incurring warehouse fees while awaiting a court decision. In fact, this method is preferred by the customs authorities as well, since upon the receipt of the true owner’s written consent, the decision for destruction is easily issued.


Turkish customs authorities are experienced and effective in combating counterfeit/pirated goods because of the country’s growing counterfeit market, which grew up as a result of its position between the European Union and Asian/Middle Eastern countries. Although rights owners can


70 World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2011


“ THE SIMPLIFIED DESTRUCTION MECHANISM ENABLES INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS HOLDERS TO REQUEST THE DESTRUCTION OF THE SUSPECTED INFRINGING OR COUNTERFEIT PRODUCTS THAT HAVE BEEN DETAINED OR SUSPENDED UNDER CONTROL OF CUSTOMS, WITHOUT A COURT ORDER.”


record their rights at customs, the customs authorities can also ex officio suspend goods that are suspected of infringing an intellectual or industrial property right, and inform the rights owner. Until the New Customs Regulation, a rights holder had to start a civil or criminal action and obtain an injunction order within 10 working days of receiving notification of the suspended goods.


Although it has been almost 18 months since the New Customs Regulation was accepted, it is not possible to say that the ‘simplified destruction’ method is used effectively. Rights owners prefer not to use it, and due to its rare use, the customs authorities have not gained experience in implementing the method. For this reason, the simplified destruction process takes more than a month to implement. We believe that, in due course, rights owners will be able to use the simplified destruction mechanism more effectively.


Isik Ozdogan is a partner at Moroglu Arseven Law Firm. She can be contacted at: iozdogan@morogluarseven.av.tr


Ezgi Baklaci is an associate at Moroglu Arseven Law Firm. She can be contacted at: ebaklaci@morogluarseven.av.tr


www.worldipreview.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84