REPRESENTATION IN CHINA


One lawyer, who did not wish to be named, predicts that in the next decade or so, “the light will grow dim on foreign law firms”. But while some would agree with that proposition, others argue that the international players will remain successful. Aſter all, China is not the only country with restrictions on who can practice—many others enforce some limitations, without unduly hampering the big players’ efforts. Ultimately, they would argue, it’s a question of expertise, experience and institutional structure. Most of the big international player have had a head start of decades, if not centuries, on their Chinese counterparts, and that’s not ground that can be made up quickly.


International, but not international


While some American and European law firms can boast considerable history in China, and especially in Hong Kong (Baker & McKenzie, Jones Day, Hogan Lovells, Bird & Bird, and Gide Loyrette Nouel, to name a handful), other, technically foreign, law firms have even hardier roots. Take Deacons, the Hong Kong firm that traces its genesis to 1851, when a young English solicitor came to work in the colony, as it was then. Today, Deacons maintains an exceptionally strong Hong Kong practice, but also has offices in China.


Annie Tsoi, an IP attorney in Deacons’ Hong Kong office, explains that the firm is expanding on the Chinese mainland, with an IP partner expected to move to its Shanghai office soon. While Tsoi acknowledges the difficulties that hers and other firms have had in coming to grips with the PRC legal systems (most of Deacons’ employees are trained under common law), she sees Hong Kong as acting “like a window” on China, providing opportunities for companies to get advice from an international law firm that nonetheless has close ties and history with the mainland.


Locally sourced


Numerous local PRC firms boast intellectual property practices. Te most well established is probably CCPIT, which was started by a government initiative in the 1950s and, until the mid-1980s, was the only trademark agency in China. Its institutional memory and size make it a popular choice with Chinese and international clients, and indeed, many of the newer intellectual property firms in China were set up by former CCPIT attorneys. Another government- instigated firm, Liu Shen & Associates, also garners excellent feedback from rivals.


But if these firms had a head start, other firms have quickly caught up. King & Wood is widely


respected, and with more than 200 people working on IP matters, it’s one of the larger practices in China. It too boasts international offices, in Tokyo and the US, and a clear majority of its IP clients are international companies. With 12 different Chinese offices, it has unparalleled geographical coverage on the mainland—and that’s a key consideration for companies worried about infringement outside the major Chinese markets.


“ NUMEROUS LOCAL PRC FIRMS BOAST INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY PRACTICES. THE MOST WELL ESTABLISHED IS PROBABLY CCPIT, WHICH WAS STARTED BY A GOVERNMENT INITIATIVE IN THE 1950s AND, UNTIL THE MID- 1980s, WAS THE ONLY TRADEMARK AGENCY IN CHINA. ITS INSTITUTIONAL MEMORY AND SIZE MAKE IT A POPULAR CHOICE WITH CHINESE AND INTERNATIONAL CLIENTS, AND INDEED, MANY OF THE NEWER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY FIRMS IN CHINA WERE SET UP BY FORMER CCPIT ATTORNEYS.”


Tese types of firms generate their own work, both with local and international clients, but many also benefit from close ties with international operations. David Tian, at An Tian Zhang & Partners, explains that his team has worked closely with international players such as Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Hogan Lovells and DLA Piper, on matters in the past. Unlike King & Wood, An Tian is an IP boutique, one of several that have emerged in recent years to cater to growing demand.


Kangxin & Partners is another such, though its client base is more heavily weighted towards Chinese clients (about 65 percent). Tat said, the firm has handled matters for international clients like Swarovski Crystal in the recent past.


22 World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2011


Unusually for a Chinese law firm, Kangxin can also trumpet the services of a native English speaker. Aaron Hurvitz, an American lawyer, assists the firm’s international clients with regard to the Chinese IP landscape and business markets.


Many Chinese firms promote themselves as having particular strengths in specific IP areas. Lian Yunze, an IP attorney at Hylands Law Firm in Beijing, says that “the best service comes from speciality”. To that end, the firm has eight separate, dedicated IP teams, specialising in specific areas such as customs actions, domain name disputes, patents, trademarks and copyright. With a particular focus on anti-counterfeiting, the firm has enjoyed considerable success in the past 12 months. It filed five criminal anti-counterfeiting cases in 2010, securing jail sentences in three cases— that’s no easy feat in China.


Last but not least, there are innumerable smaller operations working on IP in China. While they might not have the depth of practice of some of their larger rivals, they can be extremely reliable for the right matters. Firms such as Jun He, Peksung and Wenping (based in Hong Kong) have all developed solid client bases and gain good feedback.


The other option


Te future for Chinese intellectual property firms looks rosy. As the country continues to advance on the world stage, becoming more affluent and more innovative, there is not going to be any shortage of work. International law firms may have to adapt a little to counteract the rising stars of the Chinese bar, or perhaps explore alternatives. One possibility is an alliance. Many international players already have close links with specific Chinese firms, but some have taken it even further. Rouse, for example, seems to have the best of both worlds. With its international consulting service providing advice to clients from across the globe, it channels the nitty-gritty work through Lusheng Law Firm, a wholly Chinese-owned company set up by a former Rouse partner. Tis exclusive arrangement suits both parties, and for clients, provides a level of certainly that is not always possible using other arrangement.


Whether this kind of set-up becomes more common in the future remains to be seen—as ever, the market will decide that. But what does seem clear is that the IP legal market in China is only going to get more crowded. And in a crowded marketplace, those firms that prosper will be those that can stand out from the crowd.


www.worldipreview.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84