JURISDICTION REPORT: PHILIPPINES


ADDING IP TO THE SCHOOL CURRICULUM


Anne Mariae Celeste V. Jumadla Sapalo Velez Bundang & Bulilan


Te present 15th Congress of the Philippines will introduce a number of legislative changes that are intended to increase the level of awareness in the country of intellectual property and enhance the IP system. Among these are:


• Requiring the teaching of IP in all primary, secondary and tertiary schools, and


• Expanding ‘fair use’ for specialised formats for the exclusive use of the blind or visually handicapped.


Teaching IP


Senate Bill (SB) No. 696, filed on July 7, 2010, mandates the teaching of IP ownership, particularly copyright law, as part of the curriculum of all primary, secondary and tertiary schools in the country. Tis move to introduce the importance of IP to Filipinos at an early age is designed to change people’s outlook and enable the country to become a knowledge- based centre.


Te Philippines has not lacked IP laws. Section 13, Article XIV, of the 1987 Constitution provides that the state “shall protect and secure the exclusive rights of scientists, inventors, artists, and other giſted citizens to their intellectual property and creations, particularly when beneficial to the people, for such period as may be provided by law”.


Congress enacted into law on June 6, 1997 the IP Code of the Philippines, repealing the Patent Law of 1947, the Trademark Law of 1947 and the Copyright Law of 1972, among others.


Nevertheless, IP rights violations are still ubiquitous. It seems that the majority of the Philippine population is still not aware of the IP laws or has yet to fully grasp the concept of an IP right as a property right.


It is therefore important that IP be taught in schools.


To meet this objective, the IP Philippines, together with the Department of Education (DepEd) and the National Book Development Board (NBDB), embarked on developing modules for the teaching of IP, including preparing manuscripts for the IP Rights (IPR) Teacher’s Manual and IPR Student’s Guide, which would integrate the basic IP concepts into identified learning competencies, such as economics, social studies, science, research, music, arts and physical education.


Expanding ‘fair use’


SB No. 301, filed on July 6, 2010 grants exemptions from securing permission from publishers or copyright owners of printed materials to


www.worldipreview.com


Anne Mariae Celeste V. Jumadla is an associate at Sapalo Velez Bundang & Bulilan. She can be contacted at: info@sapalovelez.com


World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2011 65


reproduce these in specialised formats for the exclusive use of the blind or visually handicapped, thereby amending the section on ‘fair use of copyrighted work’ of the IP Code.


Under the IP Code, fair use of copyrighted work includes use for: • Criticism • Comment • News reporting • Teaching, including multiple copies for classroom use • Scholarship • Research • Similar purposes, and • Decompilation.


Under SB No. 301, the reproduction or distribution of copies of published articles/materials in a specialised format exclusively for the use of the blind or visually impaired persons also constitutes fair use, provided that such copies and distribution are not for profit, and that the copyright owner and the date of the original publication are indicated. Specialised formats include Braille, audio, large print, digital text or other formats that enable the blind or visually impaired person to read the printed material.


Te privilege, however, does not extend to standardised, secure or norm- referenced tests and related testing materials, or to computer programs, other than the portions that are conventional human language, including descriptions of pictorial works, and are displayed to users in the ordinary course of using the computer programs.


Considering the length of time required before print materials can be provided in a format that a visually impaired person can read, the proposed expansion of fair use, specifically beneficial to the blind or visually impaired persons, is intended to provide them with equal and timely access to copyrighted print materials, and thus improve their access to education, work and social integration.


Tese Senate-proposed changes to the IP laws, particularly directed to educating Filipinos and providing access to IP, could pave the way to greater changes in the future of IP in the country.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84