This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Number of international and national applications in Turkey MADRID PROTOCOL


Year


Number of international applications designating Turkey


1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: www.tpe.gov.tr 2396 4958 6399 5651 6033 6547 8340 8537 9995 10165 8142 7903


Percentage increase


— 106.93% 29.06% -11.69% 6.76% 8.52% 27.39% 2.36% 17.08% 1.70% -19.90% -2.94%


Number of national


applications by foreign applicants


3659 3237 2417 2244 2174 2388 3096 3530 3925 4229 3624 4083


Percentage increase


-29.06% -11.53% -25.33% -7.16% -3.12% 9.84% 29.65% 14.02% 11.19% 7.75% -14.31% 12.67% Total


Percentage increase


6055 8195 8816 7895 8207 8935 11436 12067 13920 14394 11766 11986 22.95% 20.76% -0.95% 25.16% 6.27% 22.59% 27.30% 10.66% 8.64% 3.25% -4.52% 18.89%


Te popularity of the system grows alongside the participation of new members. Turkish companies generally file applications in nearby countries, especially in Europe, Middle Asia and the Middle East. Te number of contracting parties from the Middle East is not high, but the system is still preferable for member countries because of its benefits. For example, there is no need for legal documents at the application stage of international registrations. Tis speeds up and simplifies the procedures compared to national applications in Middle East countries.


According to the WIPO statistics database dated June 2010, in 2009, applicants from Turkey that filed applications via the Madrid System accounted for 2.1 percent of total international registrations—the 14th highest number of any country. Te Turkish renewals account for just 0.2 percent of the total international renewals, but this can be explained by the relatively recent adoption of the Madrid Protocol in Turkey. And the difference in the percentage of international registrations and renewals clearly demonstrates the increasing demand for the international registration system in Turkey.


42 World Intellectual Property Review May/June 2011


www.worldipreview.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84